Dear members of pkg-fso,
I am looking for a sponsor for package "androidsdk-tools".
Steffen Möller approached me with an interest in the package. He told me he
didn't
have time to review it, but suggested to try asking you for sponsorship.
Also Cc to debian-java to make sure there aren't any d
Hi Jakub,
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 09:46:23AM +0200, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Steffen Möller approached me with an interest in the package. He told me he
> didn't
> have time to review it, but suggested to try asking you for sponsorship.
>
> Also Cc to debian-java to make sure there aren't any duplica
Hi,
Sebastian Reichel writes:
> The pkg-fso group is quite small. I guess I'm the only one uploading
> packages from this group since quite some time. For me it's the same
> as for Steffen - I do not have the time to sponsor this package.
> There are still other packages (directly related to pkg-
Hi all,
I've been using the debhelper build system that ships with maven-debian-helper
for one package and ran into a number of inconsistencies between it and the
CDBS build. Hunting down the differences took some time, but it essentially
boiled down to comparing share/perl/maven.pm with
share/cdb
Moin!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> On 16/08/13 13:15, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> I talked to rene here at DebConf. The problems did show up in the past
>> when running the testsuite (hangs). Rene tried with current OpenJDK on
>> falla -- in current kfreebsd sid -- and it does now works as well as
On 16:21, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Switching could -- as far as I understand -- work as follows:
>
> * Make openjdk-7 default. No other actions needed and should work for a
>start
> * Retry everything that failed to build before
> * Probably BinNMU everything already built. Probably not str
Hi all,
I am running into a problem during the apidoc generation phase when using
maven-debian-helper [0] ever since the maven target to generate the
documentation was changed from "javadoc:jar" to "javadoc:javadoc". This was
done to fix #711852 and I was under the impression after a short glimpse
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 14:56 +0200, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> I've been using the debhelper build system that ships with maven-debian-helper
> for one package and ran into a number of inconsistencies between it and the
> CDBS build. Hunting down the differences took some time, but it essentially
>
Hi Sebastian, hi Timo,
Thank you both for your kind replies.
> Gesendet: Samstag, 17. August 2013 um 14:04 Uhr
> Von: "Timo Juhani Lindfors"
> An: "Sebastian Reichel"
> Cc: "Jakub Adam" , debian-java@lists.debian.org,
> pkg-fso-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: [pkg-fso-maint] RFS:
On 17/08/2013 16:21, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Moin!
>
> Steven Chamberlain writes:
>> On 16/08/13 13:15, Christoph Egger wrote:
>>> I talked to rene here at DebConf. The problems did show up in the past
>>> when running the testsuite (hangs). Rene tried with current OpenJDK on
>>> falla -- in curr
Your message dated Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:55:00 +0200
with message-id
and subject line java-common: policy mandates java?-runtime even for headless
packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #551300,
regarding java-common: policy mandates java?-runtime even for headless packages
to be marked as done
Le samedi 17 août 2013 17:02:42 Wolodja Wentland a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I am running into a problem during the apidoc generation phase when using
> maven-debian-helper [0] ever since the maven target to generate the
> documentation was changed from "javadoc:jar" to "javadoc:javadoc". This was
> d
Le 17/08/2013 21:22, Damien Raude-Morvan a écrit :
> I'm sure what is the right way to fix this (#711852) but maybe we should keep
> installing JAR from javadoc.
The javadoc jar is certainly not desirable in the documentation packages.
An alternative is to run:
mvn javadoc:javadoc -Dreport
13 matches
Mail list logo
