I noticed that even jessie and sid both still provide the same outdated
GlassFish 2.x release, while there is GlassFish 3.x release available
since years. I am an experienced Java Programmer and GlassFish
administrator and would love to see jessie to provide 3.x instead of
2.x. What do I have to do
"Markus Karg" writes:
hello Markus,
> I noticed that even jessie and sid both still provide the same outdated
> GlassFish 2.x release, while
> there is GlassFish 3.x release available since years. I am an experienced
> Java Programmer and GlassFish
> administrator and would love to see jessie
So if I am reading correctly between the lines your answer means, that I
have to start completely from scratch, do all the work on my own, and
there are no current plans by anybody to support GF 3.x already? I
wonder what then actually is the idea of having a maintainer registered
for GlassFish?
>
Le 11/05/2013 13:51, Markus Karg a écrit :
> I noticed that even jessie and sid both still provide the same outdated
> GlassFish 2.x release, while there is GlassFish 3.x release available
> since years. I am an experienced Java Programmer and GlassFish
> administrator and would love to see jessie
Okay I see, so I *do not* need to start from scratch, but can (simply spoken)
replace the content taken from upstream in the GF-2.x packages, change the
number to GF-3.x and it should (more or less) be done?
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:ebo...@apache.org]
> Sent: S
Am 11.05.2013 17:31, schrieb Markus Karg:
> So if I am reading correctly between the lines your answer means, that I
> have to start completely from scratch, do all the work on my own, and
> there are no current plans by anybody to support GF 3.x already? I
> wonder what then actually is the idea o
Understood. How to find out whether any other people currently work on
the same idea?
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Klose [mailto:d...@debian.org]
> Sent: Samstag, 11. Mai 2013 17:41
> To: Markus Karg
> Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: GlassFish 3.x
>
> Am 11.05.201
"Markus Karg" writes:
> Okay I see, so I *do not* need to start from scratch, but can (simply
> spoken) replace the content taken from upstream in the GF-2.x packages,
> change the number to GF-3.x and it should (more or less) be done?
More or less, not all of my posting applies to upgrading pac
Hi all,
I updated the mysql-connector-java package to the latest upstream
release. There were some changes by Miguel waiting to be released too.
Here is the changelog:
* New upstream release
* Refreshed the patches
* Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes)
* debian/rules: Improve
9 matches
Mail list logo
