RFS: javacc/5.0-5 (updated watch file and package refresh for unstable)

2013-05-07 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, I updated the package for JavaCC. The watch file was broken and I refreshed other things in the package. Here is the changelog: * Fixed the watch file * Enabled the unit tests * Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 * Switched to quilt for managing the patches * Removed Michael Ko

RFS: jmock/1.2.0-2 (updated watch file for unstable)

2013-05-07 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, Here is a minor update to the jMock 1.x package: * Fixed the watch file * Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes) * Removed Michael Koch from the Uploaders list (Closes: #654037) * debian/copyright: Updated the Format URI http://mentors.debian.net/package/jmock http://me

Re: RFS: ehcache/2.6.7-1 - [UPLOADED]

2013-05-07 Thread tony mancill
On 05/06/2013 06:14 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > I updated the ehcache package for the latest upstream release. That's a > minor update, no file changed in the debian/ directory. > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/ehcache > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ehcache/ehc

workflow for libhtmlcleaner-java and davmail

2013-05-07 Thread Geert Stappers
Previous message was only in http://bugs.debian.org/569668 Op 2013-05-07 om 14:12 schreef Alexandre Rossi: > Thanks. > > Filled as #707093. http://bugs.debian.org/707093 > I'm hoping to be able to prepare packages for sponsorship on Friday. > > Alex We need^W^WI feel the need to invest some

Re: RFS: libjtype-java/0.1.3-1 (new upstream release and watch file update) - [UPLOADED]

2013-05-07 Thread tony mancill
On 05/06/2013 08:30 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libj/libjtype-java/libjtype-java_0.1.3-1.dsc Uploaded to unstable. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Beginner's Question on Java Security Fixes

2013-05-07 Thread Markus Karg
While programming for more than 25 years (more than a decade with Java SE / EE), I am still a beginner with Debian. So please don't mind my possibly stupid question: Looking at all the security fixes that Oracle provides, I wonder how I can see what of these fixes are contained in Debian? I mean, f

Re: Beginner's Question on Java Security Fixes

2013-05-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Markus Karg wrote: > While programming for more than 25 years (more than a decade with Java SE / > EE), I am still a beginner with Debian. So please don’t mind my possibly > stupid question: Looking at all the security fixes that Oracle provides, I > wonder how I ca

AW: Beginner's Question on Java Security Fixes

2013-05-07 Thread Markus Karg
Thank you for your kind answer. So this means there is no simple answer like e. g. "On Debian, openjdk-7-jre-2.x has the same security level than OpenJDK 7u21", but I have to check each single CVE, right? Thanks! -Markus -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: paul.is.w...@gmail.com [mailto:paul

Re: Beginner's Question on Java Security Fixes

2013-05-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Markus Karg wrote: > Thank you for your kind answer. So this means there is no simple answer like > e. g. "On Debian, openjdk-7-jre-2.x has the same security level than OpenJDK > 7u21", but I have to check each single CVE, right? In general, if you are running th

AW: Beginner's Question on Java Security Fixes

2013-05-07 Thread Markus Karg
Maybe there is a misunderstanding. I am running Debian Wheezy, neither jessie nor sid. Certainly I want the best stability and security. Using Oracle's product, this would result in manually installing 7u21. But what if using openjdk-7-jre on wheezy? The version tag says it is 7u3, but I doubt t

Re: Beginner's Question on Java Security Fixes

2013-05-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Markus Karg wrote: > Maybe there is a misunderstanding. I am running Debian Wheezy, neither jessie > nor sid. Certainly I want the best stability and security. Using Oracle's > product, this would result in manually installing 7u21. But what if using > openjdk-7-