On 02/19/2013 12:58 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 19/02/2013 08:08, tony mancill a écrit :
>> I don't see any harm in option 3 - in fact, I can address it in the next
>> upload. It won't have any effect on the current version of tomcat7 to
>> be released with wheezy though.
>
> The only issue wi
Thomas Koch writes ("Copyright assignement for Debian tools?"):
> I'm currently hacking on the maven-repo-helper package. The source
> code contains copyright statements from the original author. Now
> when I add classes it would be logical to add "Copyright 2013 Thomas
> Koch".
Right.
> But I do
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Copyright assignement for Debian tools?"):
> But if you don't want to do that, you do have the possibility to
> assign it to Software in the Public Interest. I'm not sure how the
> law works exactly in your jurisdiction but in the UK and the US to do
> that you need state
If you ware not aware, with your bug report you reached the debian-java ML.
Usually to keep up with Java development in Debian, please subscribe to the
list, archives can be found at https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/
Am 04.02.2013 18:27, schrieb Christian Bernardt:
> Package: default-jdk
> Ver
4 matches
Mail list logo
