Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

* Matthias Klose: > get the files from testing/unstable && touch debian/control.in && > debian/rules debian/control I end up with this: mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/plugin/icedteanp && \ cd /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/plugin/icedteanp && \ x86_64-lin

Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

Hi Florian, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > I suppose we need to disable building the plugin on lenny (it's in a > separate package there anyway, I think).  Is there an easy way to do > this? I think there is some code in debian/rules: ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH)

Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:10:39 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 14.01.2011 20:46, Florian Weimer wrote: > >Do you plane to switch to IcedTea 1.9 or a later version during the > >squeeze release? > > I will not do this myself, altough I would welcome this. Apparently > Debian does allow these

Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

Hi, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > How does that follow?  These kinds of updates are sort of allowed for > sun-java6 because it's non-free so there's no choice.  That does not > apply to openjdk, as far as I know. I think that openjdk is not that different. Oracle does

Re: Joining the pkg-java team

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-01-15 17:18, Guillaume Mazoyer wrote: > Hi, > > I'm Guillaume and I would like to join the pkg-java team to contribute > to some packages that I use. I'm a developer of the java-gnome bindings > (http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/) so I'm ve

Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

* Torsten Werner: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: >> How does that follow?  These kinds of updates are sort of allowed for >> sun-java6 because it's non-free so there's no choice.  That does not >> apply to openjdk, as far as I know. > > I think that openjdk is n

Re: RFS: libjava-gnome-java (updated package)

> Please commit it. We can always revert it if we are not happy. Done. Do I have to let my package in the debian mentors list or should I remove it from there? -- Guillaume Mazoyer - http://www.respawner.fr/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

* Florian Weimer: > AFAICT, Debian is actually shipping IcedTea releases, but those are > re-rebranded as IcedTea. Sorry, "re-rebranded as OpenJDK". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Ar

Re: RFS: libjava-gnome-java (updated package)

Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 12:17 +0100, Guillaume Mazoyer a écrit : > > Please commit it. We can always revert it if we are not happy. > Done. > > Do I have to let my package in the debian mentors list or should I > remove it from there? I will sponsor it for you. But for now, it fails to buil

Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Florian Weimer: > >> AFAICT, Debian is actually shipping IcedTea releases, but those are >> re-rebranded as IcedTea. > > Sorry, "re-rebranded as OpenJDK". Oracle occasionally releases source tarballs at

Re: RFS: libjava-gnome-java (updated package)

> I will sponsor it for you. Thank you :) > But for now, it fails to build under Debian experimental (which is > mandatory due to some dependencies that you set). > > > GCC generated/bindings/org/gnome/notify/NotifyNotification.c > generated/bindings/org/gnome/notify/NotifyNotification.c: In f