Du nouveau pour vos produits : zoom, rotations photos 360 e t animations 3D

2010-12-08 Thread Hervé Lamartine
Si vous ne visualisez pas ce mail correctement, http://info.packshotcrm.com/t/59746/960/4074624/2137156/0/?l=960-2137156-9272-15a98ae9 cliquez ici. PackshotLive met vos produits sur le devant de la scène. http://info.packshotcrm.com/t/59747/960/4074624/2137156/0 PackshotLive vous permet de pu

Clear definition of default-java and its scope

2010-12-08 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi In light of LP: #687263 and LP: #564699 I think it might be time for us to clearly define the purpose of default-java; not only for our own sake but also for the sake of Java users on Debian(-based distros). Note that by "default-java" I here re

Re: compatibility analysis for Java libraries

2010-12-08 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le mercredi 08 décembre 2010 à 18:00 +0300, Andrey Ponomarenko a écrit : > Hello, > > I know that some Debian maintainers use ABI Compliance Checker (ACC) > tool along with Ustream Tracker at LinuxTesting.org [1] for testing > backward compatibility of C/C++ libraries. Now I want to inform you > a

Re: Clear definition of default-java and its scope

2010-12-08 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Niels, On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > I propose we solve this by explicitly defining default-java to hold the > two definitions I mentioned above (it is the only sane choice for > backwards compatibility as far as I can tell) and post-Squeeze introduce > a "system-defau

Re: Clear definition of default-java and its scope

2010-12-08 Thread Matthias Klose
On 08.12.2010 14:00, Niels Thykier wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi In light of LP: #687263 and LP: #564699 I think it might be time for us to clearly define the purpose of default-java; not only for our own sake but also for the sake of Java users on Debian(-based dist

Re: Clear definition of default-java and its scope

2010-12-08 Thread Torsten Werner
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > No. This should not be done. Relying on an alternative for a build makes > problems much harder to debug, if you first have to find out which > alternative is actually used, and which alternative is used for the build. > > I am fine with impr

Re: Clear definition of default-java and its scope

2010-12-08 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-12-08 21:18, Torsten Werner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> No. This should not be done. Relying on an alternative for a build makes >> problems much harder to debug, if you first have to find out which >> a

Re: Handling Java Webapps in Debian and Fedora

2010-12-08 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-12-07 13:31, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hey > > The Fedora IRC meeting is tomorrow[1], sorry for the short notice. > > ~Niels > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting:Java_SIG_2010-12-08 > > Here are the minutes of the minutes[1]; I d

Re: RFS: libspark-java

2010-12-08 Thread Andrew Ross
Hi Tony, I had more of a think about this, and looked at some other packages that use libservlet2.5. They use the versioned jar files. Given the version is also in the package name I think this actually makes sense - the package won't work with some later libservlet* anyway without updating the de

Re: RFS: timingframework

2010-12-08 Thread tony mancill
Sponsored and tagged in the svn repo. Cheers, tony On 11/27/2010 12:08 PM, Andrew Ross wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "timingframework". > > * Package name: timingframework > Version : 1.0-1 > Upstream Author : Sun Microsystems, Inc > * URL