Re: OpenJDK on hppa (reprise)

Tom Marble wrote: > Back in January there were some threads on this and specifically > about the direction of stack growth [0] (cross posted [1] [2]). > > The Debian Java team has decided that as we need to support this > architecture and thus I wanted to see if any others have attacked > this or

RFS: service-wrapper-java

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "service-wrapper-java". * Package name : service-wrapper-java Version : 3.5.3-1 Upstream Author : Tanuki Software Ltd * URL : http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/ * License : GPLv2 Section : java It builds these binary packages: service-w

Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

Hi, On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Tom Marble wrote: > On 07/28/2010 06:44 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> OpenJDK was just uploaded to unstable, based on the IcedTea6-1.8.1 >> release [1]. This version addresses some security issues, >> and this version should be shipped with squeeze > A group of

Library handling in squeeze + 1

One of the other things we discussed at DebConf 10 is the handling of Java libraries. For the benefit of those not at DebConf here are the problems and conclusions we reached (it's long, but there are some questions at the end). Leaving aside the problem of detecting when upstream break ABI compat

Re: jar-content is updated daily now

On 08/05/2010 01:27 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > I am updating the file > daily > now. It lists the content of all jar files in Debian unstable. The > format is easily zgrep-able: > > $ zgrep /ObjectMap.class jar-content.txt.gz > aspec

Bug#591998: RM: openjdk-6 [mips] -- ROM; does no longer build on mips

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, openjdk-6 does no longer build on mips. The maintainers are currently not able to fix the issue and that is why we as for the removal. Please ignore the default-jdk,-jre(-headless) dependency because I'll upload a new version of java-common soon which