Re: Policy Changes: Executable jars and removal of Compiler section.

Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Mon Apr 12 19:06, Niels Thykier wrote: >> p2_java_executables.patch rewords the part about executable jar files >> under the Java Programs section. It will allow Java Programs to install >> in accordance with the Debian Policy (and not just in /usr/bin). It also >> speci

JAI status?

Hi Java folks I found that recent version of Openjump and possibly other forks such as Degree (all GIS related) depends also on TIFF stuff taken from JAI. Is there anyone that analyzed JAI license in order to have a possible non-free distribution? Anyone worked in recent times about that? -- Fr

Re: JAI status?

Hi Francesco, On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Is there anyone that analyzed JAI license in order > to have a possible non-free distribution? Anyone worked in recent times about > that? you might want to start here:

Re: RFS: libspring-ldap-java (new package, 2nd try)

Hi Miguel On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libspring-ldap-java". the package looks good but I have one question: what is the source format of the file docs/reference/pdf/spring-ldap-reference.pdf? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUB

Re: RFS: libspring-ldap-java (new package, 2nd try)

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > In the upstream svn repo there are some docbook files. > https://src.springframework.org/svn/spring-ldap/trunk/src/docbkx/ > > But those file were not included in the tarball, they just included > the generated > *.html and .pdf files. Yo

Re: JAI status?

On 4/15/2010 4:10 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi Francesco, > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine > wrote: >> Is there anyone that analyzed JAI license in order >> to have a possible non-free distribution? Anyone worked in recent times about >> that? > > you might want to s

Re: RFS: libspring-ldap-java (new package, 2nd try)

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > the package looks good but I have one question: what is the source > format of the file docs/reference/pdf/spring-ldap-reference.pdf? In the upstream svn repo there are some docbook files. https://src.springframework.org/svn/spring-ldap/tru

Re: RFS: libspring-ldap-java (new package, 2nd try)

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > You can either remove the generated files from the orig tarball or add > the source files to it. Ok, I will generate a new package later and I will let you know about it. Just a question: if I include the source files in the upstream orig

Re: RFS: libspring-ldap-java (new package, 2nd try)

Miguel Landaeta schrieb: > Just a question: if I include the source files in the upstream orig > tarball, I still > can not generate those file because the jar used by upstream is not in > Debian yet. > So, is it correct to include source and generated files although I am > not providing > a mean t