Hi Matthew,
thanks for the review. Some questions back (if I removed your remark, I
just accepted it).
Matthew Johnson wrote:
- there is a debian/patches/debian-changes* patch which has been
autogenerated by dpkg-source. Looks like the clean target doesn't remove
knopflerfish-osg
While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon
jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for
java packaging. I have fixed these problems along with some lintian
errors/warnings and uploaded the package to mentors.debian.net. The
package maintainer is lis
Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> [...]
>> with default-jdk and have default-jre as the first alternative.
>> If it
>> _does_ only work with openjdk then you should not depend on |
>> java2-runtime. In any case you don't need to depend on |
>> sun-java5-jre |
>> sun-java6-j
Hi,
subject change to reflect topic change...
Niels Thykier wrote:
Yes, I am guilty here. On a related note, does anyone know if the draft
[1] has been ratified or it is just a "proposed" change? If it is the
latter then lets get (the parts of) it (we want) approved so I can
integrate them.
No
Dear mentors (CC: debian-java@lists.debian.org),
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pleiades", Japanese Language
package
for Eclipse. It is very popular for Japanese Eclipse users. Its newest release
is downloaded about 50,000 times.
* Package name: pleiades
Version :
On Sun Mar 21 13:18, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> thanks for the review. Some questions back (if I removed your remark, I
> just accepted it).
(policy-related changes in the other thread)
>>- the other patches aren't listed in the series. Are you using 3.0
>> (quilt) and also simple-patchsys
On Sun Mar 21 15:31, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Yes, I am guilty here. On a related note, does anyone know if the draft
>> [1] has been ratified or it is just a "proposed" change? If it is the
>> latter then lets get (the parts of) it (we want) approved so I can
>> integrate them
On Sun Mar 21 17:55, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon
> jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for
> java packaging. I have fixed these problems along with some lintian
> errors/warnings and uploaded the package to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, and it's definitely my mistake for sponsoring without checking the bug. I
cc:ed Nicolas on the upload and here again. Nicolas, my apologies for the
over-zealous upload.
Thank you,
Tony
Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Sun Mar 21 17:55, Onkar Shinde
Uploaded to the archive.
Thank you,
Tony
Onkar Shinde wrote:
> While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon
> jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for
> java packaging. I have fixed these problems along with some lintian
> errors/warnings and up
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Sun Mar 21 17:55, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon
>> jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for
>> java packaging. I have fixed these problems along wi
On Sun Mar 21 23:24, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> By the way the changes I did fixed only fixed mostly lintian
> errors/warnings. Should that be avoided when doing NMU?
You should not be fixing lintian warnings for the sake of it, NMU procedure
says "only fix filed bugs". In the case of moving ant to bu
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Sun Mar 21 23:24, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> By the way the changes I did fixed only fixed mostly lintian
>> errors/warnings. Should that be avoided when doing NMU?
>
> You should not be fixing lintian warnings for the sake of it, NMU proc
Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Dear mentors (CC: debian-java@lists.debian.org),
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pleiades", Japanese Language
> package
> for Eclipse. It is very popular for Japanese Eclipse users. Its newest
> release
> is downloaded about 50,000 times.
>
> * Package
On Sun Mar 21 21:17, Niels Thykier wrote:
> It would be nice if it could be installed beneath /usr/share/eclipse/
> rather than /usr/lib/eclipse/ because it is a large arch all package.
> However it did not work when I tried to move it (even when symlinking
> from /usr/lib/eclipse/). I think it c
Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>
>> I am also keenly aware that liblogkit-java is obsolete (by upstream)
>> and I would love to have it RM'ed; however we still have packages
>> depending on it[3].
>
>
> I am already working on migrating these p
On Mon Mar 22 00:57, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Dear mentors (CC: debian-java@lists.debian.org),
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pleiades", Japanese Language
> package
> for Eclipse. It is very popular for Japanese Eclipse users. Its newest
> release
> is downloaded about 50,000
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for your work; is it correctly asserted that libfreemarker-java
> is the only package that needs to be updated before we can get
> liblogkit-java removed?
> If so, then I will not try to get liblogkit-java uploaded.
Yes, libfr
Hi,
thank you for review!
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:17:16 +0100
Niels Thykier wrote:
> It would be nice if it could be installed beneath /usr/share/eclipse/
> rather than /usr/lib/eclipse/ because it is a large arch all package.
put it to /usr/share/eclipse, now.
> However it did not work whe
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:38:35 +
Matthew Johnson wrote:
> - you don't close an ITP in the changelog, you should generally be filing
> ITPs
> (cc'd to -devel) in case anyone has comments about the package
Add that entry to changelog, thanks!
> - as I said, arch-all content should be i
20 matches
Mail list logo
