RFS: libjfreechart-java 1.0.13-2

2009-11-23 Thread Onkar Shinde
The packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn. Latest changelog entry for reference: libjfreechart-java (1.0.13-2) unstable; urgency=low [ Onkar Shinde ] * debian/control - default-jdk/jre conversion. - Change runtime jre dependency to match target JVM version specified in buil

RFS: emma-coverage 2.0.5312+dfsg-3

2009-11-23 Thread Onkar Shinde
Packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn. The latest changelog entry for reference. emma-coverage (2.0.5312+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control - default-jdk/jre conversion. - Add cdbs build dependency. - Add quilt dependency for patches. - Change section of binary

Re: RFS: emma-coverage 2.0.5312+dfsg-3

2009-11-23 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Onkar Shinde wrote: > Packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn. > > The latest changelog entry for reference. > emma-coverage (2.0.5312+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low > It seems that some upstream files are modified¹ without using a patch system, is that normal? ¹: http://svn.debian.org/views

Re: RFS: emma-coverage 2.0.5312+dfsg-3

2009-11-23 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Onkar Shinde wrote: >> Packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn. >> >> The latest changelog entry for reference. >> emma-coverage (2.0.5312+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low >> > > It seems that some upstream files are modified¹ without using a

Re: RFS: libjfreechart-java 1.0.13-2

2009-11-23 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Onkar Shinde wrote: > The packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn. On its way. Many thanks for all your work ! Vincent -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite oft

Re: RFS: emma-coverage 2.0.5312+dfsg-3

2009-11-23 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Onkar Shinde wrote: > > Actually they were previously updated without a patch system. You can > check contents of diff.gz for previous version. Having these changes is a bad thing. Getting rid of them is a good thing :) > I simply reverted these files to their upstream state as the change no > l

Re: RFS: emma-coverage 2.0.5312+dfsg-3

2009-11-23 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Onkar Shinde wrote: >> >> Actually they were previously updated without a patch system. You can >> check contents of diff.gz for previous version. > > Having these changes is a bad thing. Getting rid of them is a good thing :) > >> I simply re

Re: commons-collections packages

2009-11-23 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently we have two commons-collections packages in repository. > libcommons-collections-java - 2.x release > libcommons-collections3-java - 3.x release > > I browsed the upstream release archive and it looks like the last > rel