Re: RFS: libcommons-collections-java 2.1.1-9

2009-11-19 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:42:01PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: > > Hi Onkar, > > > > Thank you for working on this.  I took a look at the packaging.  There > > are several lintian warnings that are easily addressed: > > > > W: libcommons-collections-java source: changelog-should-mention-nmu > > W: l

Forum Creativity Training VIII

2009-11-19 Thread GULF INNOVATION
Your email program does not support HTML. To view an online version of this email, please click the link below. http://a.ocho.purlsmail.com/rwcode/content.asp?SID=1&SiteID=35432&Section=602109&EmailID=115967141&HitID=1258631907000 To unsubscribe, click the link below. http://a.ocho.purlsmail.co

Re: RFS: libcommons-collections-java 2.1.1-9

2009-11-19 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:42:01PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> > Hi Onkar, >> > >> > Thank you for working on this.  I took a look at the packaging.  There >> > are several lintian warnings that are easily addressed: >> > >> > W: libcommons

RFS: libgnumail-java 1.1.2-4

2009-11-19 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi, I am looking for sponsorship for package libgnumail-java 1.1.2-4. The packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn. Latest changelog entry for reference: libgnumail-java (1.1.2-4) unstable; urgency=low [ Onkar Shinde ] * debian/rules - Remove ANT_HOME, unecessary files in DEB_JARS.

Re: RFS: libcommons-collections-java 2.1.1-9

2009-11-19 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Donnerstag, den 19.11.2009, 06:11 -0600 schrieb Kumar Appaiah: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:42:01PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: > > > Hi Onkar, > > > > > > Thank you for working on this. I took a look at the packaging. There > > > are several lintian warnings that are easily addressed: > > > >

Re: RFS: libcommons-collections-java 2.1.1-9

2009-11-19 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 19.11.2009, 06:11 -0600 schrieb Kumar Appaiah: >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:42:01PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> > > Hi Onkar, >> > > >> > > Thank you for working on this.  I took a look at the packaging.  There >> > > a

RFS: libgnuinet-java 1.1.1-4

2009-11-19 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi, I am looking for sponsorship for libgnuinet-java 1.1.1-4. The packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn. Latest changelog entry for reference: libgnuinet-java (1.1.1-4) unstable; urgency=low [ Matthias Klose ] * (Build-)depend on default-jre/-jdk. * Set java source version to 1.4.

java packaging

2009-11-19 Thread Gabriele Giacone
Hello, I'm packaging sweethome3d [1], a java application. I have some questions regarding the best Debian way to do it. The upstream tarball includes many libraries which are all included during the build in the final jar. Most of these libraries are also available in the Debian tree and I think I

Re: java packaging

2009-11-19 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > I'm packaging sweethome3d [1], a java application. > I have some questions regarding the best Debian way to do it. > The upstream tarball includes many libraries which are all included > during the build in the final jar. > Most of these libraries are also avai

Re: java packaging

2009-11-19 Thread Gabriele Giacone
> Hello, Hi Vincent, > > Gabriele Giacone wrote: >> I'm packaging sweethome3d [1], a java application. Ok, so my next email will start with: 'Hello, I'm packaging a java application and some libraries' :) > The final jar can only contain the libraries for which the source code > is in the ori

Re: RFS: libcommons-collections-java 2.1.1-9

2009-11-19 Thread tony mancill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Onkar Shinde wrote: >> A simple workaround for that is to edit the changelog, and convert it to: >> >> [ Onkar Shinde ] >> >> >> -- Debian Java Maintainers >> Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:49:13 -0500 >> >> That way, you don't need to add yourself to uplo