Re: not eclipserc but what?

Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi list, > > I made a package that uses ~/.eclipse/eclipserc file for users' > configuration. > But as the comment in Bug#402077(*), it seems not to be recommended. > It works with eclipse3.4 in Debian but not with 3.5 in Ubuntu 9.10. > > So, what should I use for unle

Re: not eclipserc but what?

Hi (I'm on the list), On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:27:05 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote: > We no longer have to search for JVMs on start up and the "Check > for internal browser" warnings have caused nothing short of 4 bug > reports, which displays its inability to properly detect browser support > on a Len

Re: About source format 3.0

Hi, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > The reason I asked if we should switch as team is because one of the > conclusions of debconf discussions was that we will be no longer using > cdbs simple patchsys to make transition to source format 3 easier. [1] ... and we can remove

Re: About source format 3.0

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > [*] I am using git-buildpackage's patch queue stuff described at > to > update debian/patches. That works nicely even with svn. But git-import-dsc does not work with sourc

Bug#556395: ITP: freehep-swing -- FreeHEP Swing Extensions

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-java@lists.debian.org Package name: freehep-swing Version: 2.0.3 Upstream Author: FreeHEP team[1] URL: http://java.freehep.org/ License: LGPL-2.1+ Description: FreeHEP Swing Extensions Collection of Java Swing

Bug#556397: ITP: freehep-graphics2d -- FreeHEP 2D Graphics Library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-java@lists.debian.org Package name: freehep-graphics2d Version: 2.1.1 Upstream Author: FreeHEP team[1] URL: http://java.freehep.org/ License: LGPL-2.1+ Description: FreeHEP 2D Graphics Library General 2D graph