Bug#365408: Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create classpath-jre/jdk and java-jre/jdk

2009-09-20 Thread Niels Thykier
Package: java-common Version: 0.33 Severity: normal I second this proposal using the java-{jre,jdk} for free and java-{jre,jdk}-nonfree for nonfree packages. ~Niels -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500,

Bug#395372: [policy] relax or expand the "binaries in /usr/bin" restriction (2.3)

2009-09-20 Thread Niels Thykier
Package: java-common Version: 0.33 Severity: normal Hi, I second this proposal to include /usr/games in 2.3. ~Niels -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i3

RFS: javassist (updated package)

2009-09-20 Thread Niels Thykier
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:3.11-1 of my package "javassist". It builds these binary packages: libjavassist-java - library for editing bytecodes in Java libjavassist-java-doc - library for editing bytecodes in Java -- documentation The package appears to be lintian clean. Th

Bug#365408: Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create classpath-jre/jdk and java-jre/jdk

2009-09-20 Thread Matthias Klose
On 20.09.2009 13:43, Niels Thykier wrote: Package: java-common Version: 0.33 Severity: normal I second this proposal using the java-{jre,jdk} for free and java-{jre,jdk}-nonfree for nonfree packages. No, we should develop against a spec, not against a product. maybe this was more wanted in t

Bug#365408: Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create classpath-jre/jdk and java-jre/jdk

2009-09-20 Thread Michael Koch
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 06:22:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 20.09.2009 13:43, Niels Thykier wrote: > >Package: java-common > >Version: 0.33 > >Severity: normal > > > >I second this proposal using the java-{jre,jdk} for free and > >java-{jre,jdk}-nonfree > >for nonfree packages. > > No, w