Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

2009-01-08 Thread Torsten Werner
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Any advice on how to build this package in pbuilder and/or buildd? Just add deb http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ ./ to your sources.list. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject o

Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

2009-01-08 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Torsten Werner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> Any advice on how to build this package in pbuilder and/or buildd? > > Just add > > deb http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ ./ > > to your sources.list. Maybe I'm interfering

Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

2009-01-08 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > Maybe I'm interfering here, but I'm pretty sure that such a dirty > hack is a no-go for the security team. that hack in not needed in Debian because the package is in unstable. Can you explain what is the problem for the security tea

Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

2009-01-08 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Torsten Werner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: >> Maybe I'm interfering here, but I'm pretty sure that such a dirty >> hack is a no-go for the security team. > > that hack in not needed in Debian because the package is i

Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

2009-01-08 Thread Torsten Werner
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > The problem here is that you don't have a complex package: one > binary, which build-depends on itself. Surely, you can work around > that, can't you ? How? Just send me a patch and I'll apply it if it works. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNS

Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

2009-01-08 Thread Vincent Fourmond
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > gcc is a nightmare - it is one of the very few things where you > can't work around the bootstrapping problem. Just as a side note, gcc does not directly depend on itself. Or, rather, gcc-4.3 depends on packages which are produced by g

Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

2009-01-08 Thread Torsten Werner
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > You managed to build it at some point. You didn't have it before and > you had it after. So you did manage one to work around that. So you > should be able to build it without build-depending on itself, no ? I had simply put the upstream

Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

2009-01-08 Thread Vincent Fourmond
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Torsten Werner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: >> You managed to build it at some point. You didn't have it before and >> you had it after. So you did manage one to work around that. So you >> should be able to build it without bu

Re: Circular build dependency in maven-plugin-tools

2009-01-08 Thread Florian Weimer
* Vincent Fourmond: > Imagine there is a huge security hole in this package. Do you really > think the security team will want to use the *problematic* package to > build a *clean* one ? The machines we use for building have no untrusted local users, and only restricted networking. Of course,

RFS: electric 8.08-1

2009-01-08 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi, Can you please sponsor package electric version 8.08-1? The updated packaging is available in pkg-java svn. The changes done to the packaging are: 1. New changelog entry 2. Addition of ${misc:Depends} as runtime dependency to fix lintian warning. Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-j

Re: For those who care about batik

2009-01-08 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > Onkar Shinde wrote: >> As I was the one who updated batik in Ubuntu I want to ask few >> comments about the differences between Ubuntu packaging and Debian >> packaging. I haven't yet tried to build the package. >> >> 1. Are you sure follo