Re: Please unblock statcvs 1:0.4.0.dfsg-3

2008-10-14 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Vincent Fourmond [Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:03:18 +0200]: > Dear release team, > Could you please unblock statcvs 1:0.4.0.dfsg-3 ? It drops a > dependency on a old and outdated package, libjdom-java (see #502037). As > a bonus, the package was made lintian-clean. > Thanks, Unblocked. -- Ad

Re: Which libjdom is relevant?

2008-10-14 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:56 AM, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Onkar Shinde wrote: >> Debian currently contains three libjdom packages, libjdom-java, >> libjdom0-java, libjdom1-java. > > This is a disaster! I wasn't even aware of the existence of libjdom-java. > Please, can the maintai

Batik, fop, xmlgraphics ... [was: For those who care about batik]

2008-10-14 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le lundi 13 octobre 2008 à 22:19 +0200, Vincent Fourmond a écrit : > Hello, > > Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > >> I switched fop.sh to java-wrappers. You can see that it lead to a > >> significant decrease of the size ;-)... Could you check it works fine ? > >> If that is the case, I'll switch the oth