Re: Java wrappers and java-common

2008-01-06 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi Vincent, comparing the wrapper script from FreeMind, version 0.9.0, not yet in Debian [1], and your script, I'm missing the following features: - no check that JAVA_CMD actually exists and is executable if the variable is set. - /usr/bin/java as last fallback if nothing else helps. - debu

Re: icedtea status?

2008-01-06 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
2008/1/5, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Dec 29, 2007 6:04 PM, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > Icedtea/OpenJDK will only solve the move to main for x86 and x64 > > arches. There is a port from Gary Benson on PowerPC (only in > > interpreter mode at the moment and it's barel

Re: icedtea status?

2008-01-06 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Arnaud Vandyck] > Java apps are arch: all. How do you move "fop" (which is arch: all) > to main on x86 only? I think it'd be a problem. I can't imagine > Debian to distribute java package in main only for x86 and the same > packages in contrib for other arches! There is no need to have them in c

Re: icedtea status?

2008-01-06 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
2008/1/6, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > There is no need to have them in contrib for other arches. You seem > to assume that packages in main need to work on all architectures. As > far as I know, there is no such requirement. It only need to work on > at least one. The policy se

Re: icedtea status?

2008-01-06 Thread Michael Koch
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 04:38:48PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > 2008/1/6, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > There is no need to have them in contrib for other arches. You seem > > to assume that packages in main need to work on all architectures. As > > far as I know, there is no

Re: icedtea status?

2008-01-06 Thread Michael Koch
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 12:29:58AM +0930, Paul Wise wrote: > On Dec 29, 2007 6:04 PM, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't know how is working on icedtea/openjdk on Debian but AFAIK, > > there are a lot of licenses and they must be all analysed. > > doko, are you out there? Are

【INCLUBのメルマガお宝情報】 (クジ付き)NO.167-特選広告

2008-01-06 Thread INCLUB
**      【INCLUBのメルマガお宝情報】(くじ付き)    ◆貴方のビジネスパートナーです◆ **  ★「くじ」に当たれば有料独占広告が3回無料で配信できます   「くじ」はメルマガの最後の方にあります(1日3回まで) [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: icedtea status?

2008-01-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Jan 7, 2008 2:40 AM, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I work on icedtea package currently. There are some issues taht I can > hopefully sort out this week. Could you please take over the RFP then? http://bugs.debian.org/452750 Also, the Ubuntu packaging is in pkg-java SVN, will you

Re: icedtea status?

2008-01-06 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
2008/1/6, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] > I have to say I agree with Petter. I would say that stuff can go to main > when it works on one or two or three archs and not others with free > runtimes. Runtimes will get bug reports that stuff dont works on certain > platforms and people will w

Re: icedtea status?

2008-01-06 Thread Michael Koch
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 07:40:57AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > 2008/1/6, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [...] > > I have to say I agree with Petter. I would say that stuff can go to main > > when it works on one or two or three archs and not others with free > > runtimes. Runtimes will get