On 7/19/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:49:03PM +0200, Henning Sprang wrote:
[...]
> (I'm trying to invest some time everytime I have some left to get that
> cleaned up)
That work is really needed. Thanks for taking a stab on this.
Henning,
Your work is
On 5/11/07, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri May 11 07:19, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:11:27PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > OK, so as an alternative, I have a version which reads the Class-Path:
> > variable from the jar.
> Setting the Class-Path attribu
On 5/11/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
We could put into the policy that we need to make sure the Class-Path
attribute has a sensible value.
This is a very very good idea! I fully support this.
--
Arnaud Vandyck
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Michael Koch writes:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:27:22PM +0200, Henning Sprang wrote:
> > Michael Koch wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:28:09PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > >> Am I missing something? Isn't Sun's Java 6 in Debian still in non-free?!
> > > It is. And it will never mo
* Arnaud Vandyck:
> On 5/11/07, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri May 11 07:19, Michael Koch wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:11:27PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> > > OK, so as an alternative, I have a version which reads the Class-Path:
>> > > variable from the jar.
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
