Re: Plans about OpenJDK ?

On 5/19/07, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] Because openJDK won't be available for all architectures we will have to use gcj for most of our architectures. That could lead to problems when we'll have a dfsg openjdk, it'll be on x86, x64, but what will be the status of other arch

Re: New tomcat5.5 package

On 5/18/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:08:52PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote: > I'm about to upload a new tomcat5.5 package (5.5.20-5). Thanks for your work. Yes, excellent, thanks, -- Arnaud Vandyck -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Re: Plans about OpenJDK ?

Arnaud Vandyck writes: > On 5/19/07, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > Because openJDK won't be available for all architectures we will > > have to use gcj for most of our architectures. > > That could lead to problems when we'll have a dfsg openjdk, it'll be > on x86, x

Re: Plans about OpenJDK ?

On 5/19/07, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Arnaud Vandyck writes: [...] > Is there plans to [...] port the vm on other arches? [...] There is supposedly a protable interpreter in OpenJDK. We (@ Red Hat) are investigating this for other arches. You rock Andrew ;-) (well and Tom an

Re: best Depends: line for an app that needs Java 5 but prefers Java 6?

On 5/12/07, Elliott Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] P.S. if anyone knows, I'd be curious to learn why the packages are called sun-java5-jdk and sun-java6-jdk rather than just being versions 5.* and 6.* of sun-java-jdk. I have the suspicion that understanding that would be educational. T

Re: Plans about OpenJDK ?

On 5/19/07, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You rock Andrew ;-) (well and Tom and all the RedHat team of course ;-)) And of course all those Sun guys who made this possible! ;-) -- Arnaud Vandyck -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble