Re: Selecting a javac which supports at least Java5

2007-03-15 Thread Benjamin Mesing
[Please CC, I am not subscribed] >>> How do I ensure, that the correct compiler is used. >>> Is the only way, to explicitly set the java >>> compiler path (i.e. /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0/bin/javac >> Yes, that is the only correct way. We must be sure that the package >> builds with identical result

Re: Selecting a javac which supports at least Java5

2007-03-15 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 01:55:35PM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote: > [Please CC, I am not subscribed] > > >>> How do I ensure, that the correct compiler is used. > >>> Is the only way, to explicitly set the java > >>> compiler path (i.e. /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0/bin/javac > > >> Yes, that is the onl

Re: Selecting a javac which supports at least Java5

2007-03-15 Thread Sam Couter
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Who says the results are the same? Who says the results are the same > with different JDK 5 implementations? The Java bytecode spec says so. Most differences will indicate bugs in one implementation or another, which need to be found and fixed. -- Sam Cou

Re: Selecting a javac which supports at least Java5

2007-03-15 Thread Benjamin Mesing
[Please CC, I am not subscribed] > > >>> How do I ensure, that the correct compiler is used. > > >>> Is the only way, to explicitly set the java > > >>> compiler path (i.e. /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0/bin/javac > > > > >> Yes, that is the only correct way. We must be sure that the package > > >> bui

Re: Selecting a javac which supports at least Java5

2007-03-15 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:13:16PM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote: > [Please CC, I am not subscribed] > > > > >>> How do I ensure, that the correct compiler is used. > > > >>> Is the only way, to explicitly set the java > > > >>> compiler path (i.e. /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0/bin/javac > > > > > > >>

Re: Selecting a javac which supports at least Java5

2007-03-15 Thread Michael Koch
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:26:39AM +1100, Sam Couter wrote: > Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Who says the results are the same? Who says the results are the same > > with different JDK 5 implementations? > > The Java bytecode spec says so. Most differences will indicate bugs in > one