gcj-4.1 in experimental is not just about gcjwebplugin; it contains a
backport of a classpath-0.92 prerelease and gcj from the current
trunk. it's this upgrade which makes gcj interesting for etch. If we
do want to include, it has to be tested with packages currently
depending on it (packages like
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 07:19:44PM +0530, ???
[??] (Praveen) ??? [???] (A) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am too keen to try out jboss on classpth 0.92. Anyone working on the
> packaging? It would be great if we can have it go to etch.
Expect it today or tomorrow in i
Hi,
Currently, there is update-java-alternatives in java-common to manage
the various java commands and how they refer to which implementation.
People can however ignore it and update-alternatives themselves, things
can get out-of-sync, and how to set priorities is unclear and not easy
to decide o
Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes:
> and how to set priorities is unclear and not easy to decide on.
IIRC that we decided on the priorities. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2006/05/threads.html
> In the current Debian Java policy, java libraries are required to
> properly document how to modif
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 02:39:15PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 11:42:03AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > It's a little weird. The package that puts the plugin into firefox dir
> > > (via
> > > symlink) is java-gcj-compat-plugin, but gcjwebp
5 matches
Mail list logo
