Am Dienstag, 18. April 2006 22:23 schrieb Barry Hawkins:
> I replied to that posting[0], and I don't think the discussion yielded
> a lack of support for using version numbers in .jar file names.
The points you listed are:
1.) Java(TM) libraries have a notorious tendency (not unlike other lan
Package: java-common
Version: 0.23
Severity: minor
*** diff/java-common
21c21
< * Information on how to create dummy packages to fullfill java2
---
> * Information on how to create dummy packages to fulfill java2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstabl
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:07:31PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 18. April 2006 22:23 schrieb Barry Hawkins:
> > I replied to that posting[0], and I don't think the discussion yielded
> > a lack of support for using version numbers in .jar file names.
>
> The points you listed
3 matches
Mail list logo