Bug#363165: [PROPOSAL] drop version number from jar installations

2006-04-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Dienstag, 18. April 2006 22:23 schrieb Barry Hawkins: > I replied to that posting[0], and I don't think the discussion yielded > a lack of support for using version numbers in .jar file names. The points you listed are: 1.) Java(TM) libraries have a notorious tendency (not unlike other lan

Bug#363985: Spelling mistake in package description

2006-04-20 Thread Simon Waters
Package: java-common Version: 0.23 Severity: minor *** diff/java-common 21c21 < * Information on how to create dummy packages to fullfill java2 --- > * Information on how to create dummy packages to fulfill java2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstabl

Bug#363165: [PROPOSAL] drop version number from jar installations

2006-04-20 Thread Barry Hawkins
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:07:31PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Dienstag, 18. April 2006 22:23 schrieb Barry Hawkins: > > I replied to that posting[0], and I don't think the discussion yielded > > a lack of support for using version numbers in .jar file names. > > The points you listed