Re: RFC: libinieditor-java

On 11/10/05, Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (1) > Architecture: any > > Java packages are Architecture: all ! This change will also mean to > use Build-Depends-Indep and to move the build stuff into the > binary-indep: target in the debian/rules file. Done. > (2) > Depends: gij | kaff

Re: Does libforms-java qualify for main?

Hi, I didn't get any answer to this email, so I reformulate my question: - is someone willing to sponsor me on this package placed in main? - if not, is someone willing to sponsor me on this package placed in contrib? Thanks, Eric (and the version is also uploaded in CVS) > Hi, > > I have repac

Re: Does libjcalendar-java qualify for main?

Hi, I didn't get any answer to this email, so I reformulate my question: - is someone willing to sponsor me on this package placed in main? - if not, I already have a sponsor for contrib ;-) - is it OK to upload this package to CVS, even though it's not (yet) maintained by Java Maintainer? Thanks

Re: Does libforms-java qualify for main?

On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 01:15:39PM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: > Hi, > > I didn't get any answer to this email, so I reformulate my question: > - is someone willing to sponsor me on this package placed in main? > - if not, is someone willing to sponsor me on this package placed in contrib?

Re: Does libforms-java qualify for main?

> > Just be patient. > Wow, wow, nobody told me it was a prerequisite to package Java for Debian! OK, I'll do my best... ;-) Eric PS: I'm on both Debian Java and Java Maintainers mailing lists, no need to CC. -- N/A signature -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u