-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(spring cleaning in my mailboxes... ;-))
29 Mar 2005 21:35:23 +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David N. Welton) wrote:
Hi David,
> "Michael Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Michael,
>> I see no reason to imidiately switch everything to eclipse-ecj
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:26:18 -0800,
Jeff Breidenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ~I am inclined to say this should be left to README.Debian, since not
>> all people who install liblucene-java and liblucene-java-doc may want
>> such an intrusive demo app installed by default.
>
> That's certai
Hi Wolfgang, Hi Martin,
Martin, when it'll be corrected, contact me in private, I'll try to
review it and upload it.
Was there an ITP against wnpp (http://bugs.debian.org/wnpp and search
xmlrpc or something)?
Wolfgang, thanks for your help in reviewing the package.
Cheers,
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 11:42:45AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> (spring cleaning in my mailboxes... ;-))
>
> 29 Mar 2005 21:35:23 +0200,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David N. Welton) wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> > "Michael Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Arnaud,
Now I'm checking the issues pointed by Wolfgang.
I've already searched wnpp and then filed my ITP (#303405).
Thanks!
> Hi Wolfgang, Hi Martin,
>
> Martin, when it'll be corrected, contact me in private, I'll try to
> review it and upload it.
>
> Was there an ITP against wnpp (http://b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:43:59 +0200,
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The only packages that haven't moved to liblog4j1.2-java are:
>
> * libjfreereport-java: Upstream comes bundled with 1.2.3, so the switch
>should be painless. Pat
On 4/28/05, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> The policy update is our biggest problem nowadays as I see it It is totally
> out of date and needs to to be completely redone for after-sarge anyway.
>
> I will try to start something with it soon.
It was also my intention, we have to c
Hi Wolfgang!
> I am not a DD so I cannot sponsor your package.
>
> However I had a look at it and some questions/comments:
Let's see..
> - Why don't you package the 2.0 release. Are you dependent on the
>old release (its from 2003) and is it still maintained ?
Well, the developers don't hav
ALGUEM TEM EXPERIENCIA DE IMPLANTAR UMA INTRANET EM UMA FABRICA E PARA ESTAR
INCENTIVANDO USUARIOS LEIGOS .
SE TIVER POR FAVOR ME PASSE UM POUCO MAIS DE EXPERIENCIA ESTOU COM UM
PROJETO PARA SER IMPLATADO.
Sem mais Ednei Martinez
82292069
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arnaud> As Michael pointed out, we first need to have benchmarks to know if
Arnaud> there are real advantages to compile things to native. Also, we could
Arnaud> make choice: do we need to build the libs and the apps? only the apps?
Arna
> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arnaud> About the gcj ABI, it'd be cool to know the plans of the gcj
Arnaud> devs before putting efforts in packaging java to native ;-)
GCC 4.0 includes the first working version of the BC ABI. However, we
don't yet promise actual bin
> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arnaud> I'm not in favour of compiling on the user machine. Also, don't forget
Arnaud> if the package is well done, only the native part will be compiled, the
Arnaud> jars are arch-indep so they'll not be re-compiled by the buildd's.
Ye
> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arnaud> One thing I don't like is to change the name of our jars in
Arnaud> /usr/share/java. Having the so files reflect the jar file
Arnaud> could be good but I don't know if gcj4 will like this idea ;-)
If you follow the typical BC co
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:01:41PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The only packages that haven't moved to liblog4j1.2-java are:
> >
> > * libjfreereport-java: Upstream comes bundled with 1.2.3, so the switch
> >should be painless. Patch at #306754
14 matches
Mail list logo
