Re: any free JDKs not using jikes as compiler?

2005-04-06 Thread Wolfgang Baer
Hi Andrew, Andrew Vaughan wrote: Hi The reason that I ask is that I would like to try to get Subversions java binding (JavaHL) into the archive. (The current source package has support for building JavaHL but it is disabled by default). Attached two patches which fix the jikes build problem. BTW,

gcj 4.0: RFC on this change

2005-04-06 Thread Daniele Cruciani
I just read this: http://gcc.gnu.org/PR20750 any comment on this? now if --with-java-home is not specified it works as usual daniele. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFC: Removal libxalan-java, lib-saxon-java

2005-04-06 Thread Martin Ferrari
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 15:28 +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:51:22 +0200, > Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > this is another RFC for the removal of libxalan-java > > and now also lib-saxon-java > > > > Both are no longer used in build depends nor runtime > > depends

Re: RFC: Removal libxalan-java, lib-saxon-java

2005-04-06 Thread Wolfgang Baer
Martin Ferrari wrote: On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 15:28 +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:51:22 +0200, Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: this is another RFC for the removal of libxalan-java and now also lib-saxon-java Both are no longer used in build depends nor runtime depends.

Re: RFC: Removal libxalan-java, lib-saxon-java

2005-04-06 Thread Martin Ferrari
Hi! On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 15:15 +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > > Well, not having dependencies doesn't mean they aren't used! For > > instance, I use libxalan-java!! > > Hi Martin, > > where do you need libxalan-java ? Can't you use libxalan2-java instead ? > BTW, libxalan-java is not buildable f

The only effective method

2005-04-06 Thread Allen
Newest Penis enlaregment system! Fast Extender The only effective nonsurgical method to lengthen the penis is by employing devices that pull at the glans of the penis for extended periods of time. This is known as traction; where tissues under continuous tension will undergoe cellular multiplicat

Fwd: Bug#303405: Acknowledgement (ITP: libxmlrpc-java -- Java implementation of XML-RPC protocol)

2005-04-06 Thread Martín Ferrari
-- Forwarded message -- From: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Apr 6, 2005 11:48 AM Subject: Bug#303405: Acknowledgement (ITP: libxmlrpc-java -- Java implementation of XML-RPC protocol) To: Martin Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thank you for the problem report you

Re: any free JDKs not using jikes as compiler?

2005-04-06 Thread Andrew Vaughan
Daniel Bonniot wrote: > > Unfortunately jikes 1.22 can't build JavaHL. It does build with Sun's > > JDK. > > Did you report this bug to jikes upstream? > I haven't. And I won't since Wolfgang said that jikes is only sticking closer to the spec than sun's javac. > > Is kcj coming back? > > I thin

Re: any free JDKs not using jikes as compiler?

2005-04-06 Thread Andrew Vaughan
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 06:26 pm, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Andrew Vaughan wrote: > > Hi > > > > The reason that I ask is that I would like to try to get Subversions java > > binding (JavaHL) into the archive. (The current source package has > > support for building JavaHL but it is disabled