Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:51:22 +0200,
Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is another RFC for the removal of libxalan-java
> and now also lib-saxon-java
>
> Both are no longer used in build depends nor runtime
> depends. lib-saxon-java is superseded by libsaxon-java,
> but is s
Hi
The subject line says it all. Anyone know of any free JDK packages not using
jikes as a compiler?
The reason that I ask is that I would like to try to get Subversions java
binding (JavaHL) into the archive. (The current source package has support
for building JavaHL but it is disabled by d
Andrew Vaughan wrote:
Hi
The subject line says it all. Anyone know of any free JDK packages not using
jikes as a compiler?
I don't.
I've been investigating free java compilers recently, and unfortunately jikes
really seemed like the only candidate as a drop-in javac replacement. This
might chan
Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> Andrew Vaughan wrote:
>
>>
>> Unfortunately jikes 1.22 can't build JavaHL. It does build with Sun's
>> JDK.
>
>
> Did you report this bug to jikes upstream?
BTW, jikes upstream moved to sourceforge as IBM shut down their OSS
projects websites.
http://sourceforge.net/pro
On Sun, 2005-03-04 at 17:14 -0400, Paul Galbraith wrote:
> I tried running one of the stock swing demos ("FileChooserDemo") from
> Sun's jdk 1.2, and to my pleasant surprise it started up without a hitch
> using sablevm and kaffe. It doesn't look the same as it does when
> running with the sun
5 matches
Mail list logo
