On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 23:31 +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
> Well then, I'll try to go my way using the free alternatives. Eventually
> I'll send in some feedback if something should not work as expected.
>
Hello folks,
Some time ago I've asked about "the right Java solution" on Debian platforms.
In t
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:47:59AM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 23:31 +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
>
> > Well then, I'll try to go my way using the free alternatives. Eventually
> > I'll send in some feedback if something should not work as expected.
> >
> Hello folks,
>
> Some t
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 12:20 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> classpath-doc will contain the API docs for classpath in the future.
> They are not in there because of a bug in kaffe using too much memory
> when running gjdoc. This does not happen with gcj-4.0 but this is not in
> unstable yet.
>
I unde
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:01:02PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 12:20 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
>
> > classpath-doc will contain the API docs for classpath in the future.
> > They are not in there because of a bug in kaffe using too much memory
> > when running gjdoc. This doe
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 13:12 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> If you wanna use online docs please use
> http://developer.classpath.org/doc/ and report anything that can be made
> better back to classpath.
>
Ok, fine. Thanks.
> Urgh, the bug has to be against classpath, not devhelp.
>
I could fill a
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:21:22PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 13:12 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
>
> > If you wanna use online docs please use
> > http://developer.classpath.org/doc/ and report anything that can be made
> > better back to classpath.
> >
> Ok, fine. Thanks.
>
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 13:23 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> The submitter can move it to another package via command mail. See
> instructions on http://bugs.debian.org/.
>
I've just sent a "reassign 298857 classpath" command to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I hope this works.
> Michael
>
Regards,
I.
P.S.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:35:13PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 13:23 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
>
> > The submitter can move it to another package via command mail. See
> > instructions on http://bugs.debian.org/.
> >
> I've just sent a "reassign 298857 classpath" command to
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I prepared a package for the batik 1.5.1 upstream release.
> However during testing the package I realized that batik 1.5.1
> breaks fop ! As far as I see no other packages depend on
> libbatik-java.
>
> fop is currently not
Hi Michael,
Michael Koch wrote:
I would prefer to just add a patch to fop to make it work with batik
1.5.1 and just depend on batik >= 1.5.1. Putting a second batik copy
into fop should be avoided.
You are right - there is only one compile error - but I have absolutely
no experience with awt progra
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 10:28:08PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Koch wrote:
> >I would prefer to just add a patch to fop to make it work with batik
> >1.5.1 and just depend on batik >= 1.5.1. Putting a second batik copy
> >into fop should be avoided.
>
> You are right - t
Michael Koch wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 10:28:08PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
Which one to use ?
g2d.setStroke( pi.strokeStroke ); ??
As said, I have no knowledge with awt - so if anyone can provide
the "right" solution I would prepare a new fop upload with the
patch. A batik 1.5.1 is already
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>>fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
A "solution" to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1
and also to upload a new fop package with an embedded batik
library in the current versi
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:12:35PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> >>fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
> >>A "solution" to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1
> >>and also t
14 matches
Mail list logo
