Takashi Okamoto wrote:
I would like to upload j2se-package Nov 11. If you disagree, please
tell me.
I don't disagree but I think the FTP admins will reject the package
after reading the "ftpmaster accepts packages that have been rejected a
few days ago" thread in -devel, especially
http://lists
I don't disagree but I think the FTP admins will reject the package
after reading the "ftpmaster accepts packages that have been rejected
a few days ago" thread in -devel, especially
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200311/msg00766.html.
And why do you think that? The ca
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't disagree but I think the FTP admins will reject the package
> after reading the "ftpmaster accepts packages that have been rejected
> a few days ago" thread in -devel, especially
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200311/msg00
Daniel Bonniot wrote:
And why do you think that? The cases look quite different to me.
Because the FTP admins abviously don't want to have a lot of small
packages when these small scripts/binaries with the same target users
can easily be put into a single package (that's also my opinion). But
w
Hi this();
I'm working on 'charva' package (#203187) and it has a shared library
called libTerminal.so.
Is it a good name?
If not, how to change it?
Do I put it in /usr/lib/jni/?
Do I have to split the package or can I just package it as 'charva'?
[I think it's very java-centric and it's the
Because the FTP admins abviously don't want to have a lot of small
packages when these small scripts/binaries with the same target users
can easily be put into a single package (that's also my opinion).
Yes, but I don't see what existing package could hold this script.
java-common certainly bel
Salut Arnaud, hi all,
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:20:39 +0100
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Given that a release it coming, it would be really nice if these
issues could be solved. There are at the moment 17 packages prevented
to enter testing because of kaff
Daniel Bonniot wrote:
The other bug is a build problem on m68k, so it is probably going to go
away when the builds on (alpha, arm, m68k, s390, sparc) are fixed. Are
these architecture supported upstream? If yes, then maybe Dalibor could
look at the logs and help with diagnosing the problem. If
Hi,
Thanks Dalibor for these great news (and his work on Kaffe itself). So
it seems that upstream 1.1.2 fixes most of the releast-critical problems
of kaffe (except the manpage bug). It would therefore be very important
for Java-on-Debian to have a new package made soon. Ean, can you do it?
If
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:51:39 +0100
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not personally involved in the debian packaging of kaffe, so I
> can't say what Ean's plans are.
I think Ean does not want to upload a newer kaffe because it's nearly
freeze time for Debian...
It would be bette
Hallo Arnaud,
* Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>I'm working on 'charva' package (#203187) and it has a shared library
>called libTerminal.so.
>Is it a good name?
>If not, how to change it?
Hm, from my basic JNI knowledge from eclipse, the lib is loaded from
code in a static block somewhere. Look for somet
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hallo Hubert,
>
>* Hubert Schmid wrote:
>>the package also be called 'mpkg-j2se'?
>
>BTW: what does "2se stand for?"
J2SE stands for Java2 Standard Edition in Sun-speak. Similarly,
J2EE is Java2 Enterprise Edit
Request For Tests (and for Review and for Comments)
Hi all,
It's the first time I package a jni library ('java native interface')
with a java library. Charva uses native bindings to render buttons,
listboxes etc. in a terminal.
You can apt-get libcharva1-java and libcharva1-jni here:
deb http://
Hallo T.,
* T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
>J2SE stands for Java2 Standard Edition in Sun-speak. Similarly,
>J2EE is Java2 Enterprise Edition, including a bunch of extra
>libraries useful for running an app server. In the mpkg-j2se
>context, it's presumably referring to the distribution that's
>gett
14 matches
Mail list logo
