Hi all,
Someone could tell me where I can find an apt source in order to install
j2ee support on my debian machine? I am using blackdown extra official
package for j2se, but I need j2ee.
Could you help me please?
Thanks a lot,
Mariano.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:34:55 +0100
Mariano García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> Someone could tell me where I can find an apt source in order to install
> j2ee support on my debian machine? I am using blackdown extra official
> package for j2se, but I need j2ee.
Not at the moment but
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 05:52, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:34:55 +0100
> Mariano García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> Hi,
> > Someone could tell me where I can find an apt source in order to install
> > j2ee support on my debian machine? I am using blackdown extra off
I thought that I understood that the package itself was not FREE not that the software
to make the package was not FREE?
E.g., the j2sdk is NOT FREE but the software that creates the package IS FREE.
Therefore, one could include the script in java-common and ALL parts of the
java-common are FREE.
It would also be nice if the script could handle j2ee as well as j2sdk or j2re.
J. R. Westmoreland
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 11:57:12PM +0100, Hubert Schmid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a long time ago, I promised to rework my package mpkg-j2sdk in two weeks.
> I didn't accomplish this in two weeks, but now
Hallo J.,
* J. R. Westmoreland wrote:
>It would also be nice if the script could handle j2ee as well as j2sdk
>or j2re.
It shoulkd be quite easy to implement that: It needs a script which
'knows' the downlaod files and installs it into a tmp location. It
also needs a package, which sets up the 'd
Hallo J.,
* J. R. Westmoreland wrote:
>I thought that I understood that the package itself was not FREE not
>that the software to make the package was not FREE? E.g., the j2sdk is
>NOT FREE but the software that creates the package IS FREE. Therefore,
>one could include the script in java-common a
Jan Schulz wrote:
Installer depend on unfree software and therefor at least must go into
contrib. There was some discussion, whether they should altogether go
to non-free. See debian-devel for that.
That't true for packages that only consist of an installer. However, I
don't see a reason in Polic
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 13:30, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Jan Schulz wrote:
>
> > Installer depend on unfree software and therefor at least must go into
> > contrib. There was some discussion, whether they should altogether go
> > to non-free. See debian-devel for that.
>
> That't true for packages that
9 matches
Mail list logo
