On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 03:03:29PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 14:32, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > What you are missing is that Debian binary packages must stay in sync with
> > their source package, which means that all of the packages that jikes builds
> > are handled
Hallo Ben,
I like academic discusions :)
* Ben Burton wrote:
>> * editors or other interactive things (telnet, www-browser)
>> * different version of the same tool (autoconf, gcc, shells)
>> * apps which do not require commandline apps (x-session-manager)
>> * things which behave the same (x-curs
I'm not sure that it would make sense to have scripts in the Kaffe build
for all of the Java programs Kaffe could possibly run. If these scripts
are mostly stand alone shell scripts that make adjustments to the
classpath then it would seem that they can easily be made standalone
source packages.
W
I don't see that putting the wrappers in the JVM package is a good
solution. It would be like libc6 having wrappers for a bunch of programs
that expect libc to be in some unusual location. Eventually Kaffe will
have dozens or hundreds of wrappers in its package and would, I guess,
depend on all of
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 18:28, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I don't see that putting the wrappers in the JVM package is a good
> solution. It would be like libc6 having wrappers for a bunch of programs
> that expect libc to be in some unusual location.
It's really flawed comparison. You really have only
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 19:11, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > Eventually Kaffe will have dozens or hundreds of wrappers
> What?!? What dozens? We're *probably* talking about *ONE* wrapper that
> is already in the distro thought created from different source.
I thought we were talking about things
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:10:31PM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 19:11, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > > Eventually Kaffe will have dozens or hundreds of wrappers
> > What?!? What dozens? We're *probably* talking about *ONE* wrapper that
> > is already in the distro thought
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 20:18, Adam Majer wrote:
> Yes, but there is not that many Java compilers in debian. :)
> I really doubt that there will ever be even half a dozen
> compilers.
Why would wrappers be confined only to compilers? Any program that might
be run by Kaffe (Freenet, Ant, etc.) could
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 03:03:29PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 14:32, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > What you are missing is that Debian binary packages must stay in sync with
> > their source package, which means that all of the packages that jikes builds
> > are handled
Hallo Ben,
I like academic discusions :)
* Ben Burton wrote:
>> * editors or other interactive things (telnet, www-browser)
>> * different version of the same tool (autoconf, gcc, shells)
>> * apps which do not require commandline apps (x-session-manager)
>> * things which behave the same (x-curs
I'm not sure that it would make sense to have scripts in the Kaffe build
for all of the Java programs Kaffe could possibly run. If these scripts
are mostly stand alone shell scripts that make adjustments to the
classpath then it would seem that they can easily be made standalone
source packages.
W
I don't see that putting the wrappers in the JVM package is a good
solution. It would be like libc6 having wrappers for a bunch of programs
that expect libc to be in some unusual location. Eventually Kaffe will
have dozens or hundreds of wrappers in its package and would, I guess,
depend on all of
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 18:28, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I don't see that putting the wrappers in the JVM package is a good
> solution. It would be like libc6 having wrappers for a bunch of programs
> that expect libc to be in some unusual location.
It's really flawed comparison. You really have only
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 19:11, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > Eventually Kaffe will have dozens or hundreds of wrappers
> What?!? What dozens? We're *probably* talking about *ONE* wrapper that
> is already in the distro thought created from different source.
I thought we were talking about things
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:10:31PM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 19:11, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > > Eventually Kaffe will have dozens or hundreds of wrappers
> > What?!? What dozens? We're *probably* talking about *ONE* wrapper that
> > is already in the distro thought
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 20:18, Adam Majer wrote:
> Yes, but there is not that many Java compilers in debian. :)
> I really doubt that there will ever be even half a dozen
> compilers.
Why would wrappers be confined only to compilers? Any program that might
be run by Kaffe (Freenet, Ant, etc.) could
16 matches
Mail list logo
