Seu/your email tinha/have virus

2003-09-09 Thread VIRUS MANAGER
Esta e uma mensagem automatica. por favor nao responda ela. (This is an automatic message. Don't reply please) (see below for the english version) Voce enviou uma mensagem contaminada com o(s) virus: I-Worm.Sobig.f Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Seu computador deve de estar contaminado. Utilize um

Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy

2003-09-09 Thread Dalibor Topic
--- Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >I'm quite happy with this suggestion as well (must -> may for non-free > > >JVM dependencies). If at least one of the dependencies is satisfied > > >- even if this is selected from a list of only free JVMs - then the > > >app will presumably run s

Re: JAVA_HOME and ant

2003-09-09 Thread Dalibor Topic
--- Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo Dalibor, > > Ok, I'm also good at philosophical nitpicking :) Great! :) > * Dalibor Topic wrote: > >--- Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > [...working ant...]How do you define normally? > >> Just as it is now. > >so the status quo, wit

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath

2003-09-09 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hallo Jan, --- Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo Dalibor, > > * Dalibor Topic wrote: > >> '/usr/bin/java'. If sablevm and kaffe are installed and I depend on > >> kaffe, but sablevm installs a higher priority, then I'm fd up. > >I think we both agree that this scheme is not a good

Seu/your email tinha/have virus

2003-09-09 Thread VIRUS MANAGER
Esta e uma mensagem automatica. por favor nao responda ela. (This is an automatic message. Don't reply please) (see below for the english version) Voce enviou uma mensagem contaminada com o(s) virus: I-Worm.Sobig.f Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Seu computador deve de estar contaminado. Utilize um

Re: [PROPOSAL] 3. RfD on new debian java policy

2003-09-09 Thread Dalibor Topic
--- Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >I'm quite happy with this suggestion as well (must -> may for non-free > > >JVM dependencies). If at least one of the dependencies is satisfied > > >- even if this is selected from a list of only free JVMs - then the > > >app will presumably run s

Re: JAVA_HOME and ant

2003-09-09 Thread Dalibor Topic
--- Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo Dalibor, > > Ok, I'm also good at philosophical nitpicking :) Great! :) > * Dalibor Topic wrote: > >--- Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > [...working ant...]How do you define normally? > >> Just as it is now. > >so the status quo, wit

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Virtual Packages and way to handle Classpath

2003-09-09 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hallo Jan, --- Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo Dalibor, > > * Dalibor Topic wrote: > >> '/usr/bin/java'. If sablevm and kaffe are installed and I depend on > >> kaffe, but sablevm installs a higher priority, then I'm fd up. > >I think we both agree that this scheme is not a good