Hallo Ben,
* Ben Burton wrote:
>> Anyway, this gcj isn't in debian yet.
>Or are you talking about a different version of gcj? Or am I
>misunderstanding your comment completely?
They (RH eclipse guys at least, don't know about rhug) are useing a
higly patched version of GCJ. This probably wont be
I'll be on holliday until september 9. Stefan, will your ant*.mk be
included in the official cdbs package?
I plan to move all my package that work with ant to cdbs. Some will be
able to go to main! ;)
I'm VAC but still a subscriber of the list.
Many thanks for the good job!
--
Arnaud.
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
I'll be on holliday until september 9. Stefan, will your ant*.mk be
included in the official cdbs package?
Yes, they are part of CDBS since version 0.4.5.3, so if you want to make
use of ant.mk, you need to add a versioned build dependency to your package.
I plan to m
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 17:40:16 +0200
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > I'll be on holliday until september 9. Stefan, will your ant*.mk be
> > included in the official cdbs package?
>
> Yes, they are part of CDBS since version 0.4.5.3, so if you want to ma
Hallo debian-java,
After getting all the resonses for the first part of this proposal, I
will try to modify the aproach. I don't think that this will make it
for the sarge release, so I went for a some more changes, which should
be discussed before implemented...
I still think that we can do a po
IMO, /usr/bin/javac is mainly used for hello world programms and
almost nowher ein scripts, so it's not really nessesary to have
strictly the same comandline options (man pacges will be under update
alternatives as well)
javac can also be called during package building. Unless a specific
compiler
Hallo Daniel,
* Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>javac can also be called during package building. Unless a specific
>compiler (e.g. /usr/bin/jikes) is always used, but isn't that a burden
>for users rebuilding packages?
What interface do you suggest? The discussion her pretty much showed,
that you can't
> javac can also be called during package building.
FWIW, I think having a package build relying on /usr/bin/javac is a very
bad idea. You want to be absolutely sure that a package builds out of
the box, and IMHO this means you should explicitly build-depend upon
*and* call a complier that you k
Hallo Ben,
* Ben Burton wrote:
>> Anyway, this gcj isn't in debian yet.
>Or are you talking about a different version of gcj? Or am I
>misunderstanding your comment completely?
They (RH eclipse guys at least, don't know about rhug) are useing a
higly patched version of GCJ. This probably wont be
I'll be on holliday until september 9. Stefan, will your ant*.mk be
included in the official cdbs package?
I plan to move all my package that work with ant to cdbs. Some will be
able to go to main! ;)
I'm VAC but still a subscriber of the list.
Many thanks for the good job!
--
Arnaud.
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
I'll be on holliday until september 9. Stefan, will your ant*.mk be
included in the official cdbs package?
Yes, they are part of CDBS since version 0.4.5.3, so if you want to make
use of ant.mk, you need to add a versioned build dependency to your package.
I plan to mo
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 17:40:16 +0200
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > I'll be on holliday until september 9. Stefan, will your ant*.mk be
> > included in the official cdbs package?
>
> Yes, they are part of CDBS since version 0.4.5.3, so if you want to ma
Hallo debian-java,
After getting all the resonses for the first part of this proposal, I
will try to modify the aproach. I don't think that this will make it
for the sarge release, so I went for a some more changes, which should
be discussed before implemented...
I still think that we can do a po
IMO, /usr/bin/javac is mainly used for hello world programms and
almost nowher ein scripts, so it's not really nessesary to have
strictly the same comandline options (man pacges will be under update
alternatives as well)
javac can also be called during package building. Unless a specific
compiler
Hallo Daniel,
* Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>javac can also be called during package building. Unless a specific
>compiler (e.g. /usr/bin/jikes) is always used, but isn't that a burden
>for users rebuilding packages?
What interface do you suggest? The discussion her pretty much showed,
that you can't
> javac can also be called during package building.
FWIW, I think having a package build relying on /usr/bin/javac is a very
bad idea. You want to be absolutely sure that a package builds out of
the box, and IMHO this means you should explicitly build-depend upon
*and* call a complier that you k
16 matches
Mail list logo
