Hi,
I was reported that my package, which "Depends: java-virtual-machine,
java1-runtime", could not be installed of a user's machine, who has
blackdown's j2sdk1.4 and j2re1.4 installed. j2re1.4 "Provides:
java-virtual-machine, java2-runtime".
Something seems to be wrong, since the package shoul
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 01:10:42PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> I propose the following changes in the policy, instead of the above
> paragraphs:
>
> Programs /must/ depend on /java-virtual-machine/ and the needed runtime
> environment (/java1-runtime/ or /java2-runtime/).
>
> [JVMs] can als
On Friday 15 August 2003 11:02, Philipp Meier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 01:10:42PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> > I propose the following changes in the policy, instead of the above
> > paragraphs:
> >
> > Programs /must/ depend on /java-virtual-machine/ and the needed runtime
> > environm
David Goodenough wrote:
Surely this says that having explicit runtime-? virtual packages is the wrong
way to go. What is needed is that the virtual package has a version and then
it can be compared in the normal way.
Yes, but unfortunately dpkg does not support versioned Provides: (see
#112131),
On Friday 15 August 2003 11:34, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> David Goodenough wrote:
> > Surely this says that having explicit runtime-? virtual packages is the
> > wrong way to go. What is needed is that the virtual package has a
> > version and then it can be compared in the normal way.
>
> Yes, but un
In which case fixing dpkg strikes me as far better than adding yet more
byzantine workarounds.
I'm all for somebody working on improving dpkg. At the same time, I know
this is a limitation that has been known for a long time, so it might
not be easy to fix, and will probably need some more time.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 22:56:50 +0200
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've written a little script to compare the contents of two JARs. I've
> used it compare Debian packages with upstream binaries so I know that
> the build process worked fine, for example when using CDBS or Ant and
> K
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:56:50PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> I've written a little script to compare the contents of two JARs. I've
> used it compare Debian packages with upstream binaries so I know that
> the build process worked fine, for example when using CDBS or Ant and
> Kaffe from mai
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:42AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:56:50PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > I've written a little script to compare the contents of two JARs. I've
> > used it compare Debian packages with upstream binaries so I know that
> > the build pro
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 04:35:00PM +0200, Philipp Meier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:42AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > This sounds useful. I think it could be simplified to use comm(1) rather
> > than parsing a unified diff, though.
>
> grep -f is more useful. See attached script.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:46:03AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 04:35:00PM +0200, Philipp Meier wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:42AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > This sounds useful. I think it could be simplified to use comm(1) rather
> > > than parsing
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I would think that java2 is a superset of java1.
Unfortunately, this is not the case; the deprecation of methods and
classes make java2 an intersecting set, not a superset of java1.
>I propose the following
My apologies. We installed a new mail server and I was in a car wreck
shortly after so some configuration issues went unattended. I have built
packages for 1.1.1 for Intel and they seem to work well enough. I need
to verify that I can stop using pthreads. Under 1.0.7 I could not get
ant to spawn ex
Hi Ean,
My apologies. We installed a new mail server and I was in a car wreck
shortly after so some configuration issues went unattended. I have built
packages for 1.1.1 for Intel and they seem to work well enough. I need
to verify that I can stop using pthreads. Under 1.0.7 I could not get
ant to
On 15 Aug 2003 14:44:02 -0500
Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have built packages for 1.1.1 for Intel and they seem to work well
> enough.
Very good news! :-D
> Sorry again for my absentee behavior.
You're welcome ;)
-- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg
Formateur Cellule Programma
I would think that java2 is a superset of java1.
Unfortunately, this is not the case; the deprecation of methods and
classes make java2 an intersecting set, not a superset of java1.
Deprecated features are still available. There are still tagged, so that
their use is discouraged, since they
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:39:17 +0200
Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Usually you need to know what version of what lib you need. If that
> version is packages, you add this package name to your Depends:
> dh_java (or yourself, if thats not oncluded in such a script) will
> then add t
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:38:42 +0200
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I would think that java2 is a superset of java1.
> >
> > Unfortunately, this is not the case; the deprecation of methods and
> > classes make java2 an intersecting set, not a superset of java1.
>
> Deprecated feat
Hi all
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:39:17 +0200
Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
libxalan2-java depends on libxerces2-java but you do not need
xml-apis.jar AND xmlParserAPIs.jar in your classpath. It's up to
the maintainer of the application to know what to do.
This will anyway have to
Hi,
I was reported that my package, which "Depends: java-virtual-machine,
java1-runtime", could not be installed of a user's machine, who has
blackdown's j2sdk1.4 and j2re1.4 installed. j2re1.4 "Provides:
java-virtual-machine, java2-runtime".
Something seems to be wrong, since the package should
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 01:10:42PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> I propose the following changes in the policy, instead of the above
> paragraphs:
>
> Programs /must/ depend on /java-virtual-machine/ and the needed runtime
> environment (/java1-runtime/ or /java2-runtime/).
>
> [JVMs] can als
On Friday 15 August 2003 11:02, Philipp Meier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 01:10:42PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> > I propose the following changes in the policy, instead of the above
> > paragraphs:
> >
> > Programs /must/ depend on /java-virtual-machine/ and the needed runtime
> > environm
David Goodenough wrote:
Surely this says that having explicit runtime-? virtual packages is the wrong
way to go. What is needed is that the virtual package has a version and then
it can be compared in the normal way.
Yes, but unfortunately dpkg does not support versioned Provides: (see
#112131),
On Friday 15 August 2003 11:34, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> David Goodenough wrote:
> > Surely this says that having explicit runtime-? virtual packages is the
> > wrong way to go. What is needed is that the virtual package has a
> > version and then it can be compared in the normal way.
>
> Yes, but un
In which case fixing dpkg strikes me as far better than adding yet more
byzantine workarounds.
I'm all for somebody working on improving dpkg. At the same time, I know
this is a limitation that has been known for a long time, so it might
not be easy to fix, and will probably need some more time.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 22:56:50 +0200
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've written a little script to compare the contents of two JARs. I've
> used it compare Debian packages with upstream binaries so I know that
> the build process worked fine, for example when using CDBS or Ant and
> K
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:56:50PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> I've written a little script to compare the contents of two JARs. I've
> used it compare Debian packages with upstream binaries so I know that
> the build process worked fine, for example when using CDBS or Ant and
> Kaffe from mai
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:42AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:56:50PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > I've written a little script to compare the contents of two JARs. I've
> > used it compare Debian packages with upstream binaries so I know that
> > the build pro
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 04:35:00PM +0200, Philipp Meier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:42AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > This sounds useful. I think it could be simplified to use comm(1) rather
> > than parsing a unified diff, though.
>
> grep -f is more useful. See attached script.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:46:03AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 04:35:00PM +0200, Philipp Meier wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:13:42AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > This sounds useful. I think it could be simplified to use comm(1) rather
> > > than parsing
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I would think that java2 is a superset of java1.
Unfortunately, this is not the case; the deprecation of methods and
classes make java2 an intersecting set, not a superset of java1.
>I propose the following
My apologies. We installed a new mail server and I was in a car wreck
shortly after so some configuration issues went unattended. I have built
packages for 1.1.1 for Intel and they seem to work well enough. I need
to verify that I can stop using pthreads. Under 1.0.7 I could not get
ant to spawn ex
Hi Ean,
My apologies. We installed a new mail server and I was in a car wreck
shortly after so some configuration issues went unattended. I have built
packages for 1.1.1 for Intel and they seem to work well enough. I need
to verify that I can stop using pthreads. Under 1.0.7 I could not get
ant to
On 15 Aug 2003 14:44:02 -0500
Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have built packages for 1.1.1 for Intel and they seem to work well
> enough.
Very good news! :-D
> Sorry again for my absentee behavior.
You're welcome ;)
-- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg
Formateur Cellule Programma
I would think that java2 is a superset of java1.
Unfortunately, this is not the case; the deprecation of methods and
classes make java2 an intersecting set, not a superset of java1.
Deprecated features are still available. There are still tagged, so that
their use is discouraged, since they
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:39:17 +0200
Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Usually you need to know what version of what lib you need. If that
> version is packages, you add this package name to your Depends:
> dh_java (or yourself, if thats not oncluded in such a script) will
> then add t
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:38:42 +0200
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I would think that java2 is a superset of java1.
> >
> > Unfortunately, this is not the case; the deprecation of methods and
> > classes make java2 an intersecting set, not a superset of java1.
>
> Deprecated feat
Hi all
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:39:17 +0200
Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
libxalan2-java depends on libxerces2-java but you do not need
xml-apis.jar AND xmlParserAPIs.jar in your classpath. It's up to
the maintainer of the application to know what to do.
This will anyway have to
38 matches
Mail list logo
