> "Alban" == Alban Peignier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alban> Does anyone run the blqckdown jdk1.3 into a sid
Alban> successfully ?
No, because it's not possible. All Blackdown JVM < 1.4 use internal
glibc symbols that ceased to exist with the release of glibc 2.3.1
--
Stephen
The
Why is it that debian can not run the j2sdk1.4.0_01 jre. It says that
libstc++... can not find the libjvm.so. I have set my path correctly. It
happens even when I am already root. By the way, I have installed the jdk in
/usr/local. I really need help.
Kates
- Original Message -
From: "Step
> "Kates" == Kates Gasis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kates> Why is it that debian can not run the j2sdk1.4.0_01 jre. It
Kates> says that libstc++... can not find the libjvm.so. I have
Kates> set my path correctly. It happens even when I am already
Kates> root. By the way, I have
Stephen Zander wrote:> "Alban" == Alban Peignier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alban> Does anyone run the blqckdown jdk1.3 into a sid
Alban> successfully ?
No, because it's not possible. All Blackdown JVM < 1.4 use internal
glibc symbols that ceased to exist with the release of glibc 2.
Yesterday I filed an ITP bug (#171497). Today, I have XDoclet source
and binary packages.
I am attempting to get in the queue for New Maintainership. I haven't
put in my application yet as I am trying to track down a developer to
sign my GPG key. I will submit these packages to the archive once
> "Greg" == Greg Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Greg> But isn't the whole library versioning thing meant to solve
Greg> this sort of things? why isn't the old libc kept about as
Greg> an explicit version that java can link directly to?
I suggest you consider the output of
Brett Sealey wrote:
I'm thinking I will probably need to keep the old libraries handy for the
older JVMs once I upgrade. It is a damn pity though.
I tried yesterday to use the old lic6 with the blackdown j2sdk1.3. All
the old libs are correctly loaded (with links into j2sdk/lib/i386)
*except* ld-
> "Alban" == Alban Peignier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alban> Does anyone run the blqckdown jdk1.3 into a sid
Alban> successfully ?
No, because it's not possible. All Blackdown JVM < 1.4 use internal
glibc symbols that ceased to exist with the release of glibc 2.3.1
--
Stephen
The
Why is it that debian can not run the j2sdk1.4.0_01 jre. It says that
libstc++... can not find the libjvm.so. I have set my path correctly. It
happens even when I am already root. By the way, I have installed the jdk in
/usr/local. I really need help.
Kates
- Original Message -
From: "Step
> "Kates" == Kates Gasis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kates> Why is it that debian can not run the j2sdk1.4.0_01 jre. It
Kates> says that libstc++... can not find the libjvm.so. I have
Kates> set my path correctly. It happens even when I am already
Kates> root. By the way, I have
Stephen Zander wrote:> "Alban" == Alban Peignier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alban> Does anyone run the blqckdown jdk1.3 into a sid
Alban> successfully ?
No, because it's not possible. All Blackdown JVM < 1.4 use internal
glibc symbols that ceased to exist with the release of glibc 2.3.1
Yesterday I filed an ITP bug (#171497). Today, I have XDoclet source
and binary packages.
I am attempting to get in the queue for New Maintainership. I haven't
put in my application yet as I am trying to track down a developer to
sign my GPG key. I will submit these packages to the archive once
> "Greg" == Greg Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Greg> But isn't the whole library versioning thing meant to solve
Greg> this sort of things? why isn't the old libc kept about as
Greg> an explicit version that java can link directly to?
I suggest you consider the output of
13 matches
Mail list logo
