Re: Bundling J2SDK 1.4?

2002-11-24 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Juergen" == Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Unless 1.3.1 doesn't meet your needs, I'd say no. > Juergen> I'd say yes :-) > > You would :P > > Seriously, though, are you suggesting that j2sdk1.4 is worth taking > on the

Re: Bundling J2SDK 1.4?

2002-11-24 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Darryl" == Darryl L Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Darryl> I guess, based on the dependancy on libc6 2.3.1-1 or > Darryl> better, The current 1.4.1 build requires glibc-2.1.3 or better, so the dependency probably should be changed.

Re: Bundling J2SDK 1.4?

2002-11-24 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Juergen" == Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Unless 1.3.1 doesn't meet your needs, I'd say no. Juergen> I'd say yes :-) You would :P Seriously, though, are you suggesting that j2sdk1.4 is worth taking on the excitement that is the libc6 2.3.1 upgrede? -- Stephen

Re: Bundling J2SDK 1.4?

2002-11-24 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Juergen" == Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Unless 1.3.1 doesn't meet your needs, I'd say no. > Juergen> I'd say yes :-) > > You would :P > > Seriously, though, are you suggesting that j2sdk1.4 is worth taking > on the