Greetings,
I'm trying to build a new package babel (ITP in bug 149148), but am
having a bit of trouble. Specifically, the babel build breaks in the
middle, the force-jarfile target in the compiler subdir always seems to
complete successfully, but then make dies after completing it. A
subsequ
[I'm cross-posting to debian-java and debian-mentors, because I'm not
sure whether this is a Java question or a packaging question. Please
CC me on replies, if possible.]
Can anyone suggest why libnbio2-java's build dependency on j2sdk1.3
cannot be satisfied on all 13 platforms?
http://qa.deb
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:49:53PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> [I'm cross-posting to debian-java and debian-mentors, because I'm not
> sure whether this is a Java question or a packaging question. Please
> CC me on replies, if possible.]
>
> Can anyone suggest why libnbio2-java's build depe
> Last i knew, j2sdk1.3 is not part of debian, be it in main, contrib or
> non-free, because it is not possible for us to distribute it because of
> the licencing issues.
>
> Because of that, this particular dependency will never be really
> satisfied, the auto builders will not be able to build
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:00:47PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > Last i knew, j2sdk1.3 is not part of debian, be it in main, contrib or
> > non-free, because it is not possible for us to distribute it because of
> > the licencing issues.
> >
> > Because of that, this particular dependency w
> Erm, i think it is even worse, i think that the users would need to
> install the j2sdk1.3 package or else it will be unusable. This also
> means that your package will never enter testing, i think, or maybe
> there is some kind of override for contrib/non-free packages. Also, the
> j2sdk1.3 is a
Hi,
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 01:47, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > Mmm, another idea, java is supposed to be arch-independant bytecode, so
> > you should maybe build your package arch: all instead of arch: any.
>
> Oh, I forgot to mention that... nbio is a JNI-based package (it
> provides non-blocking
> gcj is supposed to come with a working jni implementation and comes with
> gij (GNU Interpreter for Java) for interpreting bytecode. What exactly
> doesn't work with gcj? Could you please file a bug report?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
> That way we at least know about the issue.
>
> Also Kaff
Greetings,
I'm trying to build a new package babel (ITP in bug 149148), but am
having a bit of trouble. Specifically, the babel build breaks in the
middle, the force-jarfile target in the compiler subdir always seems to
complete successfully, but then make dies after completing it. A
subseque
[I'm cross-posting to debian-java and debian-mentors, because I'm not
sure whether this is a Java question or a packaging question. Please
CC me on replies, if possible.]
Can anyone suggest why libnbio2-java's build dependency on j2sdk1.3
cannot be satisfied on all 13 platforms?
http://qa.deb
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:49:53PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> [I'm cross-posting to debian-java and debian-mentors, because I'm not
> sure whether this is a Java question or a packaging question. Please
> CC me on replies, if possible.]
>
> Can anyone suggest why libnbio2-java's build depe
> Last i knew, j2sdk1.3 is not part of debian, be it in main, contrib or
> non-free, because it is not possible for us to distribute it because of
> the licencing issues.
>
> Because of that, this particular dependency will never be really
> satisfied, the auto builders will not be able to build
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:00:47PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > Last i knew, j2sdk1.3 is not part of debian, be it in main, contrib or
> > non-free, because it is not possible for us to distribute it because of
> > the licencing issues.
> >
> > Because of that, this particular dependency w
> Erm, i think it is even worse, i think that the users would need to
> install the j2sdk1.3 package or else it will be unusable. This also
> means that your package will never enter testing, i think, or maybe
> there is some kind of override for contrib/non-free packages. Also, the
> j2sdk1.3 is a
Hi,
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 01:47, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > Mmm, another idea, java is supposed to be arch-independant bytecode, so
> > you should maybe build your package arch: all instead of arch: any.
>
> Oh, I forgot to mention that... nbio is a JNI-based package (it
> provides non-blocking
> gcj is supposed to come with a working jni implementation and comes with
> gij (GNU Interpreter for Java) for interpreting bytecode. What exactly
> doesn't work with gcj? Could you please file a bug report?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
> That way we at least know about the issue.
>
> Also Kaff
16 matches
Mail list logo
