Hi,
just to make you Debian people know I had no problem running the latest IBM
JDK 1.3.0 for PPC Linux.
This JDK includes a JVM _WITH_ JIT, and outperformes by far the Blackdown JVM.
The IBM JDK is not free (in the sense of liberté) but is not for sale
either... Well, java is not free anyway...
Allready adopted it a month or two ago.
Nevertheless, there is a big probleme :
NO JAVA PLUGIN.
that's a quite big problem for a notebook used for accessing the internet !!
jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:06 24.05.2002 +0200, Jeffo wrote:
Allready adopted it a month or two ago.
Nevertheless, there is a big probleme :
NO JAVA PLUGIN.
that's a quite big problem for a notebook used for accessing the internet !!
Is it ??
Franck
---
Franck Routier
SHC - Support FIH9
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
At 12:06 PM +0200 5/24/02, Jeffo wrote:
Allready adopted it a month or two ago.
Nevertheless, there is a big probleme :
NO JAVA PLUGIN.
that's a quite big problem for a notebook used for accessing the internet !!
Hey, I've already got two JVMs installed because Tomcat crashes
constantly under Blac
Franck Routier wrote:
>
> At 12:06 24.05.2002 +0200, Jeffo wrote:
> >Allready adopted it a month or two ago.
> >Nevertheless, there is a big probleme :
> >NO JAVA PLUGIN.
> >
> >that's a quite big problem for a notebook used for accessing the internet !!
>
> Is it ??
Yes, it's a _much_ bigger pr
Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized.
> 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers
> 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no Java 3D for browsers
> 3. No Java 3D for browsers = no 3D for the Web
And this is a problem why? IMHO, the web is
Josh Huber wrote:
>
> Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized.
> > 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers
> > 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no Java 3D for browsers
> > 3. No Java 3D for browsers = no 3D for the Web
>
> And this
Le ven 24/05/2002 à 20:23, Josh Huber a écrit :
>
> And this is a problem why? IMHO, the web is much nicer without java &
> flash.
I also don't think java is for client side stuff. Anyway, one can still
use Blackdown JDK if java plugin is needed :-)
But if you run stuff like Tomcat, JBoss, Jona
> And this is a problem why? IMHO, the web is much nicer without java &
> flash.
Amen.
As satisfying as it may be for us to wallow in our "uphill, both
ways, in the snow, img tag the cause of all moral failings"
attitudes, it does occur every now and then in my workaday life that
I must go an
mmm..then which JDK wil be the best
to do only text oriented io & claculations?
am only planning to use java to do
xml > calc > text > csound > jsyn
> > Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized.
> > 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers
> > 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no Ja
electric-light-heads wrote:
>
> mmm..then which JDK wil be the best
> to do only text oriented io & claculations?
>
> am only planning to use java to do
> xml > calc > text > csound > jsyn
xml = JDK 1.4
More rationale for Java Plug-in
Browsers can't stay stuck at 1.1 forever or we all suffer
(
At 9:44 AM +0900 5/25/02, electric-light-heads wrote:
mmm..then which JDK wil be the best
to do only text oriented io & claculations?
am only planning to use java to do
xml > calc > text > csound > jsyn
If you are not planning to use any of the UI toolkits (Swing/AWT) you
might give gcj a whirl an
Josh Huber writes:
> Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized.
>> 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers
>> 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no Java 3D for browsers
>> 3. No Java 3D for browsers = no 3D for the Web
>
> And this is a pro
Hi,
just to make you Debian people know I had no problem running the latest IBM
JDK 1.3.0 for PPC Linux.
This JDK includes a JVM _WITH_ JIT, and outperformes by far the Blackdown JVM.
The IBM JDK is not free (in the sense of liberté) but is not for sale
either... Well, java is not free anyway
Allready adopted it a month or two ago.
Nevertheless, there is a big probleme :
NO JAVA PLUGIN.
that's a quite big problem for a notebook used for accessing the internet !!
jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:06 24.05.2002 +0200, Jeffo wrote:
>Allready adopted it a month or two ago.
>Nevertheless, there is a big probleme :
>NO JAVA PLUGIN.
>
>that's a quite big problem for a notebook used for accessing the internet !!
Is it ??
Franck
---
Franck Routier
SHC - Support FIH9
--
To UNSUBSC
At 12:06 PM +0200 5/24/02, Jeffo wrote:
>Allready adopted it a month or two ago.
>Nevertheless, there is a big probleme :
>NO JAVA PLUGIN.
>
>that's a quite big problem for a notebook used for accessing the internet !!
Hey, I've already got two JVMs installed because Tomcat crashes
constantly un
Franck Routier wrote:
>
> At 12:06 24.05.2002 +0200, Jeffo wrote:
> >Allready adopted it a month or two ago.
> >Nevertheless, there is a big probleme :
> >NO JAVA PLUGIN.
> >
> >that's a quite big problem for a notebook used for accessing the internet !!
>
> Is it ??
Yes, it's a _much_ bigger p
Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized.
> 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers
> 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no Java 3D for browsers
> 3. No Java 3D for browsers = no 3D for the Web
And this is a problem why? IMHO, the web is
Josh Huber wrote:
>
> Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized.
> > 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers
> > 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no Java 3D for browsers
> > 3. No Java 3D for browsers = no 3D for the Web
>
> And thi
Le ven 24/05/2002 à 20:23, Josh Huber a écrit :
>
> And this is a problem why? IMHO, the web is much nicer without java &
> flash.
I also don't think java is for client side stuff. Anyway, one can still
use Blackdown JDK if java plugin is needed :-)
But if you run stuff like Tomcat, JBoss, Jon
> > And this is a problem why? IMHO, the web is much nicer without java &
> > flash.
>Amen.
As satisfying as it may be for us to wallow in our "uphill, both
ways, in the snow, img tag the cause of all moral failings"
attitudes, it does occur every now and then in my workaday life that
I mus
mmm..then which JDK wil be the best
to do only text oriented io & claculations?
am only planning to use java to do
xml > calc > text > csound > jsyn
> > Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized.
> > 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers
> > 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no J
electric-light-heads wrote:
>
> mmm..then which JDK wil be the best
> to do only text oriented io & claculations?
>
> am only planning to use java to do
> xml > calc > text > csound > jsyn
xml = JDK 1.4
More rationale for Java Plug-in
Browsers can't stay stuck at 1.1 forever or we all suffer
At 9:44 AM +0900 5/25/02, electric-light-heads wrote:
>mmm..then which JDK wil be the best
>to do only text oriented io & claculations?
>
>am only planning to use java to do
>xml > calc > text > csound > jsyn
If you are not planning to use any of the UI toolkits (Swing/AWT) you
might give gcj a
Josh Huber writes:
> Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized.
>> 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers
>> 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no Java 3D for browsers
>> 3. No Java 3D for browsers = no 3D for the Web
>
> And this is a pr
26 matches
Mail list logo
