Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian probably can't make packages of Tomcat 4.0 because of the
> additonally required JARs, see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2001/debian-java-200112/msg00018.html
> for details.
Is it possible to make kind of installer packages for t
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Is it possible to make kind of installer packages for these
dependencies? Like the realplayer package or else.
Yes, sure it is. The ftp admins might even allow a real package for
non-free but nobody has volunteered yet.
--
Stefan Gybas
Hello world,
as it happens I am working packageing openantivirus's ScannerDaemon. It
is a .jar file and seems to work well. Now with the packageing I assume
I have to create the .jar-file from the Java sources due to Debian
Standards. Problems is I have no idea how to go about this.
There is a f
Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as it happens I am working packageing openantivirus's ScannerDaemon. It
> is a .jar file and seems to work well. Now with the packageing I assume
> I have to create the .jar-file from the Java sources due to Debian
> Standards. Problems is I have no idea ho
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to make kind of installer packages for these
> > dependencies? Like the realplayer package or else.
>
> Yes, sure it is. The ftp admins might even allow a real package for
> non-free but nobody has volun
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:46:28PM +0100, Lars Bahner wrote:
> There is a file ``build.xml'' which seems to be the equivalent of a
> makefile, but, alas, I have no idea how to invoke this.
It's a build file for Ant, just install the ant package and type ant.
This should at least compile the sourc
>> Yes, sure it is. The ftp admins might even allow a real package for
>> non-free but nobody has volunteered yet.
>
>It is possible to make a non-free package for jndi and so?
>
>Well, Stefan, I won't bother you with simple package questions, I've
>just subscribe to some Debian-dev mailing li
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have some discussions around the packaging of these kind of API,
> which are mandatory for TC 4.x on tomcat-dev and Sun employees
> clearly indicate that WE SHOULDN'T PROVIDE ANY PACKAGING OF SUCH JAR
> (RPM/DEB), see Licence
Hi Henri,
Ifo
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> especially when you (i think) argue that jakarta is not responsible to
> provide a full distribution and it's user or package maintainer
> responsability to download the different jars needed by the
> application (in our case tomcat4).
By 'package mainta
>> We have some discussions around the packaging of these kind of API,
>> which are mandatory for TC 4.x on tomcat-dev and Sun employees
>> clearly indicate that WE SHOULDN'T PROVIDE ANY PACKAGING OF SUCH JAR
>> (RPM/DEB), see Licence
>
>Hi Henri,
>
>Ifollowed somediscussions
Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > especially when you (i think) argue that jakarta is not
> > responsible to provide a full distribution and it's user or
> > package maintainer responsability to download the different jars
> > needed by the
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a real problem with the dreaded Sun Binary License. You
> could provide a jar in a product, ie a tomcat binary could be
> released with jndi, jta, javamail but couldn't put it alone.
>
> So you couldn't provide a jndi deb package
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to make kind of installer packages for these
> > dependencies? Like the realplayer package or else.
>
>
> Yes, sure it is. The ftp admins might even allow a real package for
> non-free but nobody has vo
Do I understand this correctly?
The installer behavior would be like the package that does the java docs?
If this is correct that might be a good solution.
J.R. Westmoreland
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:33:43AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > Arnaud Vandy
Two quick observations... Please correct me if I'm wrong...
If memory serves, the JSSE problem will solve itself at the release of JDK-1.4.
I recall reading that this package should be included as part of this java
release.
Second, is the LDAP you are referring to the same as the libldap-java p
I find myself with a need for the NBIO package from:
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~mdw/proj/java-nbio/
which implements non-blocking socket I/O. It's sort of a precursor to
the nbio functionality that's in the Java 1.4 beta, implemented on top
of standard socket calls like poll().
Has anyone e
>I meant the man who will make the Debian package of Tomcat. According
>to the Debian philosophy, it means making different packages and
>dependencies. The packages with license problems will not be IN a
>package but an installer package may be a good solution (the
>[end-]user
>Two quick observations... Please correct me if I'm wrong...
>
>If memory serves, the JSSE problem will solve itself at the
>release of JDK-1.4.
Yes, it will included, also with the others problematic jars.
>I recall reading that this package should be included as part
>of this java release.
>
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian probably can't make packages of Tomcat 4.0 because of the
> additonally required JARs, see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2001/debian-java-200112/msg00018.html
> for details.
Is it possible to make kind of installer packages for
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Is it possible to make kind of installer packages for these
> dependencies? Like the realplayer package or else.
Yes, sure it is. The ftp admins might even allow a real package for
non-free but nobody has volunteered yet.
--
Stefan Gybas
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hello world,
as it happens I am working packageing openantivirus's ScannerDaemon. It
is a .jar file and seems to work well. Now with the packageing I assume
I have to create the .jar-file from the Java sources due to Debian
Standards. Problems is I have no idea how to go about this.
There is a
Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as it happens I am working packageing openantivirus's ScannerDaemon. It
> is a .jar file and seems to work well. Now with the packageing I assume
> I have to create the .jar-file from the Java sources due to Debian
> Standards. Problems is I have no idea h
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to make kind of installer packages for these
> > dependencies? Like the realplayer package or else.
>
> Yes, sure it is. The ftp admins might even allow a real package for
> non-free but nobody has volu
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:46:28PM +0100, Lars Bahner wrote:
> There is a file ``build.xml'' which seems to be the equivalent of a
> makefile, but, alas, I have no idea how to invoke this.
It's a build file for Ant, just install the ant package and type ant.
This should at least compile the sour
>> Yes, sure it is. The ftp admins might even allow a real package for
>> non-free but nobody has volunteered yet.
>
>It is possible to make a non-free package for jndi and so?
>
>Well, Stefan, I won't bother you with simple package questions, I've
>just subscribe to some Debian-dev mailing l
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have some discussions around the packaging of these kind of API,
> which are mandatory for TC 4.x on tomcat-dev and Sun employees
> clearly indicate that WE SHOULDN'T PROVIDE ANY PACKAGING OF SUCH JAR
> (RPM/DEB), see Licence
Hi Henri,
If
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> especially when you (i think) argue that jakarta is not responsible to
> provide a full distribution and it's user or package maintainer
> responsability to download the different jars needed by the
> application (in our case tomcat4).
By 'package maint
>> We have some discussions around the packaging of these kind of API,
>> which are mandatory for TC 4.x on tomcat-dev and Sun employees
>> clearly indicate that WE SHOULDN'T PROVIDE ANY PACKAGING OF SUCH JAR
>> (RPM/DEB), see Licence
>
>Hi Henri,
>
>Ifollowed somediscussions
Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > especially when you (i think) argue that jakarta is not
> > responsible to provide a full distribution and it's user or
> > package maintainer responsability to download the different jars
> > needed by th
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a real problem with the dreaded Sun Binary License. You
> could provide a jar in a product, ie a tomcat binary could be
> released with jndi, jta, javamail but couldn't put it alone.
>
> So you couldn't provide a jndi deb packag
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to make kind of installer packages for these
> > dependencies? Like the realplayer package or else.
>
>
> Yes, sure it is. The ftp admins might even allow a real package for
> non-free but nobody has v
Do I understand this correctly?
The installer behavior would be like the package that does the java docs?
If this is correct that might be a good solution.
J.R. Westmoreland
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:33:43AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > Arnaud Vand
Two quick observations... Please correct me if I'm wrong...
If memory serves, the JSSE problem will solve itself at the release of JDK-1.4.
I recall reading that this package should be included as part of this java release.
Second, is the LDAP you are referring to the same as the libldap-java p
I find myself with a need for the NBIO package from:
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~mdw/proj/java-nbio/
which implements non-blocking socket I/O. It's sort of a precursor to
the nbio functionality that's in the Java 1.4 beta, implemented on top
of standard socket calls like poll().
Has anyone
>I meant the man who will make the Debian package of Tomcat. According
>to the Debian philosophy, it means making different packages and
>dependencies. The packages with license problems will not be IN a
>package but an installer package may be a good solution (the
>[end-]use
>Two quick observations... Please correct me if I'm wrong...
>
>If memory serves, the JSSE problem will solve itself at the
>release of JDK-1.4.
Yes, it will included, also with the others problematic jars.
>I recall reading that this package should be included as part
>of this java release.
36 matches
Mail list logo
