>GOMEZ> Consider that you could have a web application, .war, which
>GOMEZ> will be exploded by tomcat at runtime so you need for some
>GOMEZ> dirs, logs, work, webapps write access !!!
>
>An application server has no legitimate reason to change the code it's
>executing. Expanding a WAR file is an
Per http://bugs.debian.org/120636 --
> New upstream release, still implementing the Servlet 2.2 and JSP 1.1
> APIs (closes: #120636). Tomcat 4.0 currently can't be packaged because
> it depends on non-free JARs from Sun.
I am curious about the problem referenced about Tomcat 4.0 not being able
to
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 06:35:06AM -0500, Michael Bilow wrote:
> I am curious about the problem referenced about Tomcat 4.0 not being able
> to be packaged because it depends upon non-free JAR files from Sun.
The Tomcat 4.0.1 binary distribution contains a lot of JAR archives in
the common/lib di
Title: Untitled Document
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> The Tomcat 4.0.1 binary distribution contains a lot of JAR archives in
> the common/lib directory:
>
> activation.jar jta.jarnaming-resources.jar tyrex.license
> jdbc2_0-stdext.jar mail.jar servlet.jar xerces.jar
> jn
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I just found a few-month-old debian-java discussion about JBoss involving the
> three of you. I was wondering whether you've managed to get a JBoss package
> created and working? I'd be looking for a binary package for testing, but a
> s
> "Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> I've filed an ITP, and will probably be uploading in 2
Adam> weeks, at the most. I don't want to release the debs to the
Adam> public yet, as I am still playing around with the
Adam> debification, and I don't want to deal
Pardon my igornance if this is a dumb question, the java policy and
packaging in Debian seems to be an overcomplicated beast, and I'm not
sure why certian things are done as they are
I have java-virtual-machine-dummy and java-compiler-dummy installed.
And I have Sun's JDK living out in /usr/l
> jython depends on kaffe | java-runtime | java1-runtime | java2-runtime;
>
> Is this a problem with the way jython is packaged? Or should
> java-virtual-machine-dummy also provide java-runtime?
I want to claim that, if dummy packages will be provided, that they should
also provide java1-runtim
On 5 Dec 2001, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam> I've filed an ITP, and will probably be uploading in 2
> Adam> weeks, at the most. I don't want to release the debs to the
> Adam> public yet, as I am still playing around with the
>
>GOMEZ> Consider that you could have a web application, .war, which
>GOMEZ> will be exploded by tomcat at runtime so you need for some
>GOMEZ> dirs, logs, work, webapps write access !!!
>
>An application server has no legitimate reason to change the code it's
>executing. Expanding a WAR file is an
Per http://bugs.debian.org/120636 --
> New upstream release, still implementing the Servlet 2.2 and JSP 1.1
> APIs (closes: #120636). Tomcat 4.0 currently can't be packaged because
> it depends on non-free JARs from Sun.
I am curious about the problem referenced about Tomcat 4.0 not being able
t
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 06:35:06AM -0500, Michael Bilow wrote:
> I am curious about the problem referenced about Tomcat 4.0 not being able
> to be packaged because it depends upon non-free JAR files from Sun.
The Tomcat 4.0.1 binary distribution contains a lot of JAR archives in
the common/lib d
Title: Untitled Document
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> The Tomcat 4.0.1 binary distribution contains a lot of JAR archives in
> the common/lib directory:
>
> activation.jar jta.jarnaming-resources.jar tyrex.license
> jdbc2_0-stdext.jar mail.jar servlet.jar xerces.jar
> j
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I just found a few-month-old debian-java discussion about JBoss involving the
> three of you. I was wondering whether you've managed to get a JBoss package
> created and working? I'd be looking for a binary package for testing, but a
>
> "Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> I've filed an ITP, and will probably be uploading in 2
Adam> weeks, at the most. I don't want to release the debs to the
Adam> public yet, as I am still playing around with the
Adam> debification, and I don't want to dea
Pardon my igornance if this is a dumb question, the java policy and
packaging in Debian seems to be an overcomplicated beast, and I'm not
sure why certian things are done as they are
I have java-virtual-machine-dummy and java-compiler-dummy installed.
And I have Sun's JDK living out in /usr/
> jython depends on kaffe | java-runtime | java1-runtime | java2-runtime;
>
> Is this a problem with the way jython is packaged? Or should
> java-virtual-machine-dummy also provide java-runtime?
I want to claim that, if dummy packages will be provided, that they should
also provide java1-runti
On 5 Dec 2001, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam> I've filed an ITP, and will probably be uploading in 2
> Adam> weeks, at the most. I don't want to release the debs to the
> Adam> public yet, as I am still playing around with the
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
