Re: java Makefile

I find mmake to be the best.. (available as woody package) Although I still haven't tried ant generates a perfectly useful makefile by the looks of ant, you have to manually enter dependencies, which would be a pain if there are lots of files. mmake works out all this stuff for you. i suggest yo

Re: java Makefile

Use mmake too, however, the debian package is an old version. Check the website: http://www.tildeslash.com/mmake/ for the latest version. Ciao, Hein Rob Hazlewood wrote: I find mmake to be the best.. (available as woody package) Although I still haven't tried ant generates a perfectly useful mak

Re: java Makefile

I find mmake to be the best.. (available as woody package) Although I still haven't tried ant generates a perfectly useful makefile by the looks of ant, you have to manually enter dependencies, which would be a pain if there are lots of files. mmake works out all this stuff for you. i suggest y

Re: java Makefile

Use mmake too, however, the debian package is an old version. Check the website: http://www.tildeslash.com/mmake/ for the latest version. Ciao, Hein Rob Hazlewood wrote: > I find mmake to be the best.. (available as woody package) > Although I still haven't tried ant > > generates a perfectl