Re: Java libraries and proposal.

2001-04-08 Thread Joe Emenaker
Joe> Well, to me, "share" means share, which the jvm-specific libs Joe> aren't meant for. FYI, traditionally `share' has actually meant `architecture-independent'. Fair enough. Since I only go into /usr/share/java and /usr/share/doc, I had come to view it as the place where architecture-independe

Re: Java libraries and proposal.

2001-04-08 Thread Joe Emenaker
> > > Joe> Well, to me, "share" means share, which the jvm-specific libs > Joe> aren't meant for. > > FYI, traditionally `share' has actually meant > `architecture-independent'. Fair enough. Since I only go into /usr/share/java and /usr/share/doc, I had come to view it as the place where arch