On 2915T091302-0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It occurs to me that making any such policy work will be a real pain for
> you or whoever does it if the "make install" targets of the upstream
> packages want to use ${datadir}/java as the top of the repository.
Well, that's a problem with upstr
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > Having a "repository" subdirectory doesn't do much to keep
> > /usr/share/java clean, especially if lots of apps put jar files there.
>
> Yes, jars are messy, hence the "repository" subdirectory which is supposed to
> stay clean (following the
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> Doesn't work to just say "Conflicts: kaffe, Provides: kaffe"?
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 09:54:16AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 August 2000, at 14 h 45, the keyboard of "Ean R .
> > Schuessler"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On 2915T091302-0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It occurs to me that making any such policy work will be a real pain for
> you or whoever does it if the "make install" targets of the upstream
> packages want to use ${datadir}/java as the top of the repository.
Well, that's a problem with upst
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > Having a "repository" subdirectory doesn't do much to keep
> > /usr/share/java clean, especially if lots of apps put jar files there.
>
> Yes, jars are messy, hence the "repository" subdirectory which is supposed to stay
>clean (following the
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> Doesn't work to just say "Conflicts: kaffe, Provides: kaffe"?
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 09:54:16AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 August 2000, at 14 h 45, the keyboard of "Ean R . Schuessler"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
6 matches
Mail list logo
