Re: advantage of /usr/share/java/repository over /usr/share/java?

2000-09-15 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thursday 14 September 2000, at 11 h 52, the keyboard of [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Consensus among whom? Do Debian developers who don't care about Java > have to be involved, or can it just be those on the debian-java list. There is no clear policy on Debian about how subpolicies (Emacs, Apa

Re: advantage of /usr/share/java/repository over /usr/share/java?

2000-09-15 Thread brlewis
It occurs to me that making any such policy work will be a real pain for you or whoever does it if the "make install" targets of the upstream packages want to use ${datadir}/java as the top of the repository. This may be a better question for GNU than for Debian. Should we move the discussion to

Re: advantage of /usr/share/java/repository over /usr/share/java?

2000-09-15 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thursday 14 September 2000, at 11 h 52, the keyboard of [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Consensus among whom? Do Debian developers who don't care about Java > have to be involved, or can it just be those on the debian-java list. There is no clear policy on Debian about how subpolicies (Emacs, Ap

Re: advantage of /usr/share/java/repository over /usr/share/java?

2000-09-15 Thread brlewis
It occurs to me that making any such policy work will be a real pain for you or whoever does it if the "make install" targets of the upstream packages want to use ${datadir}/java as the top of the repository. This may be a better question for GNU than for Debian. Should we move the discussion to