Am 23.03.2014 22:12, schrieb Tim Retout:
Hi all,
What's the right thing to do when Java packages can only build against
openjdk-7-jdk, and not gcj?
Since the latest default-jdk upload, zookeeper now fails to build on
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and sparc:
https://bugs.debian.org/742405
I gue
On 25 March 2014 09:43, James Page wrote:
> Fix pushed to the git repo.
Awesome, thank you!
In the meantime, I filed a removal request for the binary packages:
https://bugs.debian.org/742544
--
Tim Retout
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 25/03/14 09:40, James Page wrote:
> On 25/03/14 00:09, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 23/03/2014 22:12, Tim Retout a écrit :
>
What's the right thing to do when Java packages can only
build against openjdk-7-jdk, and not gcj?
>> Hi Tim,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 25/03/14 00:09, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 23/03/2014 22:12, Tim Retout a écrit :
>
>>> What's the right thing to do when Java packages can only build
>>> against openjdk-7-jdk, and not gcj?
> Hi Tim,
>
> gcj is stuck with Java 5 and no longer s
Le 23/03/2014 22:12, Tim Retout a écrit :
> What's the right thing to do when Java packages can only build against
> openjdk-7-jdk, and not gcj?
Hi Tim,
gcj is stuck with Java 5 and no longer supported upstream. It's nice if
a package still works with gcj, but it wouldn't be reasonable to invest
Hi all,
What's the right thing to do when Java packages can only build against
openjdk-7-jdk, and not gcj?
Since the latest default-jdk upload, zookeeper now fails to build on
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and sparc:
https://bugs.debian.org/742405
I guess fixing it to build with gcj will be quit
6 matches
Mail list logo