On Monday 10 July 2000, at 9 h 9, the keyboard of david sims
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, they both require non-free JVMs and JDKs.
As was said here, 'of course' is not obvious. You may want to check.
> So, is this an acceptable practice for Debian?
Basically, if a free package dep
On Monday 10 July 2000, at 9 h 9, the keyboard of david sims
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, they both require non-free JVMs and JDKs.
As was said here, 'of course' is not obvious. You may want to check.
> So, is this an acceptable practice for Debian?
Basically, if a free package de
david sims wrote:
> I recently converted two of my boxes over to Debian, and I like the apt system
> so much that I'd like to distribute two of my LGPL Java packages via
> Debian/apt, if possible.
There are two ways to distribute them via APT: Either at your own web site
or as part of Debian itse
david sims wrote:
> I recently converted two of my boxes over to Debian, and I like the apt system
> so much that I'd like to distribute two of my LGPL Java packages via
> Debian/apt, if possible.
There are two ways to distribute them via APT: Either at your own web site
or as part of Debian its
I recently converted two of my boxes over to Debian, and I like the apt system
so much that I'd like to distribute two of my LGPL Java packages via
Debian/apt, if possible. They are currently distributed in the usual way via my
web site.
Of course, they both require non-free JVMs and JDKs. One of
I recently converted two of my boxes over to Debian, and I like the apt system
so much that I'd like to distribute two of my LGPL Java packages via
Debian/apt, if possible. They are currently distributed in the usual way via my
web site.
Of course, they both require non-free JVMs and JDKs. One of
6 matches
Mail list logo
