Re: tools.jar and free Java code

2004-11-17 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:03:03 +0100, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2004 16:53 schrieb Barry Hawkins: >> I guess Ant can be added to the list of things that do not run >> without tools.jar[0]. >> >> [0] - http://bugs

Re: tools.jar and free Java code

2004-11-17 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:53:11 -0500, Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess Ant can be added to the list of things that do not run without > tools.jar[0]. > > [0] - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=169755 I think it's the on

Re: tools.jar and free Java code

2004-11-17 Thread Michael Koch
Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2004 16:53 schrieb Barry Hawkins: > Shyamal Prasad wrote: > [...] > > | So would that mean that any Debian Java package that required > | tools.jar is not usable with a truly free Java at this time? Or > | is there a free tools.jar equivalent? > | > | I am specifically tal

Re: tools.jar and free Java code

2004-11-17 Thread Barry Hawkins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shyamal Prasad wrote: [...] | So would that mean that any Debian Java package that required | tools.jar is not usable with a truly free Java at this time? Or is | there a free tools.jar equivalent? | | I am specifically talking about bsh (BeanShell) - I

Re: tools.jar and free Java code

2004-11-17 Thread Michael Koch
Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2004 15:23 schrieb Barry Hawkins: > Michael Koch wrote: > | Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2004 04:07 schrieb Barry Hawkins: > |>Shyamal Prasad wrote: > |>| "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > |>| >> Perhaps even lib/tools.jar, or is that a Sun thin

Re: tools.jar and free Java code

2004-11-17 Thread Barry Hawkins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Koch wrote: | Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2004 04:07 schrieb Barry Hawkins: | |>Shyamal Prasad wrote: |>| "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |>| >> Perhaps even lib/tools.jar, or is that a Sun thing only? [...] |>tools.

Re: tools.jar and free Java code

2004-11-17 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:30:48 -0800, Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Perhaps even lib/tools.jar, or is that a Sun thing only? > > Arnaud> Yes it is. > > So would that

Re: tools.jar and free Java code

2004-11-17 Thread Michael Koch
Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2004 04:07 schrieb Barry Hawkins: > Shyamal Prasad wrote: > | "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | >> Perhaps even lib/tools.jar, or is that a Sun thing only? > | > | Arnaud> Yes it is. > | > | So would that mean that any Debian Java packa

Re: tools.jar and free Java code

2004-11-16 Thread Barry Hawkins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shyamal Prasad wrote: | "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | >> Perhaps even lib/tools.jar, or is that a Sun thing only? | | Arnaud> Yes it is. | | So would that mean that any Debian Java package that required | tools.j

tools.jar and free Java code

2004-11-16 Thread Shyamal Prasad
"Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Perhaps even lib/tools.jar, or is that a Sun thing only? Arnaud> Yes it is. So would that mean that any Debian Java package that required tools.jar is not usable with a truly free Java at this time? Or is there a free tools.