Re: the removal of java-gcj-compat will cause FTBFS errors

2010-04-12 Thread Torsten Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Michael Tautschnig schrieb: > Would you mind explaining why one should not use default-jdk-builddep? I don't really know but the name was probably chosen because default-jdk-builddep is only used as a Build-Depends whereas it makes sense to insta

Re: the removal of java-gcj-compat will cause FTBFS errors

2010-04-11 Thread Niels Thykier
Michael Tautschnig wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the source package java-gcj-compat just got removed from unstable. That >> breaks quite a number of other packages but the fix should be trivial in >> most cases: change the Build-Depends to default-jdk. Please DON'T use >> default-jdk-builddep except you know

Re: the removal of java-gcj-compat will cause FTBFS errors

2010-04-11 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> Hi, > > the source package java-gcj-compat just got removed from unstable. That > breaks quite a number of other packages but the fix should be trivial in > most cases: change the Build-Depends to default-jdk. Please DON'T use > default-jdk-builddep except you know what you are doing. > Would

the removal of java-gcj-compat will cause FTBFS errors

2010-04-11 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, the source package java-gcj-compat just got removed from unstable. That breaks quite a number of other packages but the fix should be trivial in most cases: change the Build-Depends to default-jdk. Please DON'T use default-jdk-builddep except you know what you are doing. Cheers, Torsten si