On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 10:43:02AM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>
> In the meantime I'm going to review your changes to svnkit.
Hi again,
I just uploaded svnkit 1.8.5+dfsg-1 to DELAYED/5 so it can enter to
the archive in combination with updated trilead-ssh2 package.
As comment, I had quite lo
Hi Markus,
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 12:47:52PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 03.04.2014 15:34, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> >
> > I'll review it and upload it to DELAYED/5 if everything is OK.
I just uploaded trilead-ssh2 to DELAYED/5.
> that would be great. Please go ahead and let me know if t
On 03.04.2014 15:34, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:00:35PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>>
>> I have tested all reverse dependencies of svnkit and they seem to work.
>> Only netbeans could not be tested because it's affected by another RC bug.
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> Since Matth
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:00:35PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> I have tested all reverse dependencies of svnkit and they seem to work.
> Only netbeans could not be tested because it's affected by another RC bug.
Hi Markus,
Since Matthew tagged his packages with LowThresholdNmu and
trilead-
Control: tags -1 patch
On 01.04.2014 14:21, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
> I have to do more smoke testing with svnkit and trilead-ssh2 but will
> get back to the list as soon as it's done.
Hi,
I have tested all reverse dependencies of svnkit and they seem to work.
Only netbeans could not be tes
On 31.03.2014 22:22, Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
> Pro-tip for dealing with these kind of auto-removals: If you CC the bug
> in your updates:
> * the timer is reset
> * we can easier find the latest information about the bug in the bug.
>:)
>
> Particularly, the first one is important as it g
On 2014-03-31 17:11, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 31.03.2014 15:40, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> [...]
>> Help with this is more than welcome, of course.
>
> I have committed some changes to svnkit two weeks ago and tried to build
> the latest upstream release. [1] My impression is that we need a new
>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 05:11:35PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> I have committed some changes to svnkit two weeks ago and tried to build
> the latest upstream release. [1] My impression is that we need a new
> version of libtrilead-ssh2-java first and that the package would
> otherwise build
On 31.03.2014 15:40, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
[...]
> Help with this is more than welcome, of course.
I have committed some changes to svnkit two weeks ago and tried to build
the latest upstream release. [1] My impression is that we need a new
version of libtrilead-ssh2-java first and that the packa
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 04:40:59AM +, Debian testing autoremoval watch
wrote:
> svnkit 1.7.5+dfsg-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-04-29
>
> It is affected by these RC bugs:
> 735763: svnkit: FTBFS: [javac]
> /??BUILDDIR??/svnkit-1.7.5+dfsg/svnkit-javahl16/src/main/java/o
10 matches
Mail list logo
