On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 06:35:58PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:12:29PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:43:54AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Amid all the arguments I've lost track of exactly why
> > > /usr/share/java/repository causes a prob
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
> OK. I now see why it applies to libraries, but don't see why it's a
> benefit for standalone programs (where multiple versions can't be
> installed via dpkg simultaneously anyway, and where the .jars aren't
> intended for external use). I suppose it's a li
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 06:35:58PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:12:29PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:43:54AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Amid all the arguments I've lost track of exactly why
> > > /usr/share/java/repository causes a pro
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
> OK. I now see why it applies to libraries, but don't see why it's a
> benefit for standalone programs (where multiple versions can't be
> installed via dpkg simultaneously anyway, and where the .jars aren't
> intended for external use). I suppose it's a l
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:12:29PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:43:54AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Amid all the arguments I've lost track of exactly why
> > /usr/share/java/repository causes a problem for building things. Can
> > somebody explain to me why it's worse
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:12:29PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:43:54AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Amid all the arguments I've lost track of exactly why
> > /usr/share/java/repository causes a problem for building things. Can
> > somebody explain to me why it's wors
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:43:54AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:28:19PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > Can I do the above? It's just so crappily wrong to have this, it
> > should have never existed, the person(s) who thought it up should be
> > flambayed(sp).
> >
> > I WA
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:43:54AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:28:19PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > Can I do the above? It's just so crappily wrong to have this, it
> > should have never existed, the person(s) who thought it up should be
> > flambayed(sp).
> >
> > I W
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:28:19PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> Can I do the above? It's just so crappily wrong to have this, it
> should have never existed, the person(s) who thought it up should be
> flambayed(sp).
>
> I WANT to remove ALL traces of this from ALL packages, NOW. It makes
> build
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:28:19PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> Can I do the above? It's just so crappily wrong to have this, it should have
> never existed, the person(s) who thought it up should be flambayed(sp).
I think you should calm down.
> I WANT to remove ALL traces of this from ALL packag
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:28:19PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> Can I do the above? It's just so crappily wrong to have this, it should have
> never existed, the person(s) who thought it up should be flambayed(sp).
I think you should calm down.
> I WANT to remove ALL traces of this from ALL packa
Can I do the above? It's just so crappily wrong to have this, it should have
never existed, the person(s) who thought it up should be flambayed(sp).
I WANT to remove ALL traces of this from ALL packages, NOW. It makes building
oh so difficult.
Can I do the above? It's just so crappily wrong to have this, it should have
never existed, the person(s) who thought it up should be flambayed(sp).
I WANT to remove ALL traces of this from ALL packages, NOW. It makes building
oh so difficult.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
13 matches
Mail list logo
