Re: pseudo packaegs

2005-08-02 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Martín Ferrari wrote: > Arnaud wrote: >>Not a bad idea but those Sun's non-free API's are not packaged. > > I think most people using java in enterprises should be in the same > situation as me: my employer wants java, and doesn't fscking care > about free java. So, I usually package things for in

Re: pseudo packaegs

2005-08-02 Thread Martín Ferrari
> Not a bad idea but those Sun's non-free API's are not packaged. I think most people using java in enterprises should be in the same situation as me: my employer wants java, and doesn't fscking care about free java. So, I usually package things for in-house use, and whenever I can, try to use the

Re: pseudo packaegs

2005-08-02 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Martín Ferrari wrote: > As I said today in #debian-java, I think there should be psudo > packages for standard apis, like JSSE, JCE, JAXP and such. I saw that > free implementations like jessie, gnucrypto, etc doesn't have anything > like this, which would help to maintain packages that depend on t

pseudo packaegs

2005-08-01 Thread Martín Ferrari
As I said today in #debian-java, I think there should be psudo packages for standard apis, like JSSE, JCE, JAXP and such. I saw that free implementations like jessie, gnucrypto, etc doesn't have anything like this, which would help to maintain packages that depend on those apis, and ease the transi