Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:24:02 +0200
with message-id <4c68d982.6080...@thykier.net>
and subject line policy proposal: java2 alternative - Rejected
has caused the Debian Bug report #158984,
regarding policy proposal: java2 alternative
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 158984 + wontfix
Bug #158984 [java-common] policy proposal: java2 alternative
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Hi
I am tagging this as wontfix, because I believe that a separate java in
path is no longer required with the current JVMs in Debian. Thanks for
the proposal nevertheless and feel free to write back if you feel this
proposal is still relevant.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digita
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:19:01PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Package: java-common
> Version: 0.14
>
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As the policy maintainer I would like you to file this as a bug
> > to java-common too. It helps me to remember it.
>
> Done. Going into mi
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:19:01PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Package: java-common
> Version: 0.14
>
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As the policy maintainer I would like you to file this as a bug
> > to java-common too. It helps me to remember it.
>
> Done. Going into m
Package: java-common
Version: 0.14
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As the policy maintainer I would like you to file this as a bug
> to java-common too. It helps me to remember it.
Done. Going into minimal snipping mode due to that.
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 11:54:08AM +0200, Robert
Package: java-common
Version: 0.14
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As the policy maintainer I would like you to file this as a bug
> to java-common too. It helps me to remember it.
Done. Going into minimal snipping mode due to that.
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 11:54:08AM +0200, Rober
Hi
As the policy maintainer I would like you to file this as a bug
to java-common too. It helps me to remember it.
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 11:54:08AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> I'm sponsoring a (contrib) package that depends on
> java2-runtime. I (as a user of the package) will have to inst
Hi
As the policy maintainer I would like you to file this as a bug
to java-common too. It helps me to remember it.
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 11:54:08AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> I'm sponsoring a (contrib) package that depends on
> java2-runtime. I (as a user of the package) will have to ins
> "Grzegorz" == Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Grzegorz> Blackdown released 1.4.1 beta - it may be good time to
Grzegorz> give them strict advice on how they should prepare
Grzegorz> packages for Debian.
Updated j2se packages are making their slow way onto the Black
W liście z nie, 04-08-2002, godz. 11:54, Robert Bihlmeyer pisze:
> So I propose the following addition to java-policy: Providers of
That reminds me of the fact that java-policy is still in
"proposed" state.
Is there much to be added to it before it can be called done?
Maybe we should remove some
W liście z nie, 04-08-2002, godz. 11:54, Robert Bihlmeyer pisze:
> So I propose the following addition to java-policy: Providers of
That reminds me of the fact that java-policy is still in
"proposed" state.
Is there much to be added to it before it can be called done?
Maybe we should remove some
I'm sponsoring a (contrib) package that depends on
java2-runtime. I (as a user of the package) will have to install the
Blackdown VM to make it work, but I still want other java programs to
use Kaffe because it's free. Pointing the "java" alternative to Kaffe
will break the package, though ...
So
I'm sponsoring a (contrib) package that depends on
java2-runtime. I (as a user of the package) will have to install the
Blackdown VM to make it work, but I still want other java programs to
use Kaffe because it's free. Pointing the "java" alternative to Kaffe
will break the package, though ...
So
14 matches
Mail list logo
